Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add initiatives and delivery board description #821
Add initiatives and delivery board description #821
Changes from all commits
1ded292
793128a
4dbdd00
aaa7a0d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, we are expecting Product to use this board as well, am I correct?
I am "worried" that a definition of "everything except Eng" is actually hidding the complexities for each area inside that "bucket".
I just want to make sure people realize we are purposelly "hidding" complexity (which might the the right path!)
Btw, this is not a blocker IMHO, just some thoughts I had when I reviewed this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the idea is that we all use it to track issues that are focused on delivery and tactical-level things.
Could you go into more detail on this? What kind of hidden complexity are you talking about?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As things specializes (ie. in different areas), it is easier to find differences in definitions, policies, etc.
Even cadences could be different.
With this proposal we are symplifiying pieces, assuming those differences do not exist or are just minimal ones.
We know in advance this is not true, but we can choose to model it like that if we abstract pieces enough high (the current approach). This is what I describe as "hidding"complexity, the fact we know things might be quite different but we are trying to model them with the same common abtraction. And that's a decision we are making and it is totally OK as long as we realize we are taking that decision (and understand their limitations).
Btw, re-reading this above paragraph I notice I am going maybe too meta 😉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Gotcha - thanks for this nuance. I think you have a valid concern, and it's something that we should keep in mind once we start following the retrospective process for these boards. That way we can learn and iterate