Proposal 9192 (#184)

* Import distribution

Source: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2024-October/018101.html

* Add voting strengths

Latest ADoP's report: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2024-October/018106.html

Latest Referee's report: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2024-November/018115.html

* Add voting block

* Initial votes by snail

Source: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2024-October/053836.html

* Initial votes by Mischief

Source: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2024-October/053840.html

* Initial votes by juan

Source: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2024-October/053841.html

* Initial votes by Murphy

Source: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2024-October/053844.html

* Initial votes by Janet

Source: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2024-October/053846.html

* Add url

src/main/kotlin/org/agoranomic/assessor/decisions/9192.kt

@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+package org.agoranomic.assessor.decisions
+
+import org.agoranomic.assessor.dsl.assessment
+import org.agoranomic.assessor.dsl.receivers.ai
+import org.agoranomic.assessor.dsl.receivers.quorum
+import org.agoranomic.assessor.dsl.receivers.url
+import org.agoranomic.assessor.dsl.votes.complexityBonuses
+import org.agoranomic.assessor.dsl.votes.onOrdinaryProposals
+import org.agoranomic.assessor.lib.vote.VoteKind.AGAINST
+import org.agoranomic.assessor.lib.vote.VoteKind.PRESENT
+
+@UseAssessment
+fun assessment9192() = assessment {
+    name("9192")
+    url("https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2024-November/018116.html")
+    quorum(5)
+
+    strengths {
+        default(3)
+        min(0)
+        max(15)
+
+        onOrdinaryProposals {
+            complexityBonuses {
+                maxBonus(3)
+
+                "Absurdor"(1) heldBy juan
+                "ADoP"(2) heldBy Murphy
+                "Arbitor"(2) heldBy Kate
+                "Archivist"(1) heldBy Gaelan
+                "Assessor"(3) heldBy Janet
+                "Collector"(2) heldBy Mischief
+                "Distributor"(0) heldBy omd
+                "Geologist"(1) heldBy Forest
+                "Herald"(2) heldBy Forest
+                "Illuminator"(1) heldBy Mischief
+                "Notary"(2) heldBy Forest
+                "Prime Minister"(0) heldBy Mischief
+                "Promotor"(3) heldBy snail
+                "Referee"(2) heldBy ais523
+                "Registrar"(1) heldBy juan
+                "Rulekeepor"(3) heldBy Janet
+                "Speaker"(0) heldBy kiako
+                "Spendor"(1) heldBy oliver
+                "Tailor"(1) heldBy Murphy
+                "Webmastor"(1) heldBy Quadrantal
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    proposals(v4) {
+        proposal(9192) {
+            title("Dissolution")
+            ai("1.2")
+            author(Mischief)
+            ordinary()
+
+            text(
+                """
+[At various times, folks have mentioned that crystals have influenced
+how they voted on proposals. Since they've been around a while, I
+figured it was worth talking everyone's temperature on them. In order to
+make sure crystals don't get repealed on a narrow result, I deliberately
+set the AI a little higher than it strictly needs to be. Also, at this
+point, I expect to be voting PRESENT personally.]
+
+Repeal rule 2685 (Crystals)"""
+            )
+        }
+    }
+
+    voting {
+        votes(snail) {
+            AGAINST on 9192
+        }
+
+        votes(Mischief) {
+            PRESENT on 9192
+        }
+
+        votes(juan) {
+            PRESENT on 9192
+        }
+
+        votes(Murphy) {
+            AGAINST on 9192
+        }
+
+        votes(Janet) {
+            PRESENT on 9192
+        }
+    }
+}