Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support receiving block-wise responses #22

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 24, 2017
Merged

Support receiving block-wise responses #22

merged 12 commits into from
Dec 24, 2017

Conversation

AlCalzone
Copy link
Owner

@AlCalzone AlCalzone commented Dec 8, 2017

When done, this fixes #21
Spec here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7959

@AlCalzone AlCalzone changed the title Support the block-wise transfer option defined in RFC 7959 Support receiving block-wise responses Dec 18, 2017
@AlCalzone
Copy link
Owner Author

Once this is merged, support will be followed up in #23, #24, #25

@AlCalzone AlCalzone merged commit a7f92e5 into master Dec 24, 2017
@AlCalzone AlCalzone deleted the blockwise branch December 24, 2017 12:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TypeError: optionConstructors[code] is not a function
1 participant