-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AAE-15944: allow specifying nginx manifest in setup-kind #309
Conversation
run: | | ||
kubectl apply -f $NGINX_MANIFEST | ||
kubectl apply -f ${{ inputs.nginx-manifest }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how do you plan to use it? (link a PR)
I think there are very few situations where we need to completely provide a custom nginx install manifest, while the most common use case will be to install a specific ingress-nginx version - so providing an input to customize the current /main/
subpath should be enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did not validate if changing the version would be enough: I'll set that work aside for now then
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I actually just faced a use case where that would have been useful as a setting has been changed one hour ago and it would have been useful to be able to pin the version
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To add on top of Gio's comment I would add that if changing the version would not be enough one can still patch the deployment manually as he needs to in a different tasks. If you don't min I'll take over this PR and amend to turn nginx-manifest
input to a nginx-igress-ref
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR is just a draft but feel free to reuse it: as I said above I did not validate the changes for which this would have been useful.
Also as discussed with @gionn the input does not need to be the whole URL, it could be controlling the "main" part in the URL only
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes @alxgomz please go ahead (and FYI my dependent unsuccessful PR is/was Activiti/activiti-cloud#1165)
done with #326 --> resolve |
Checklist
Description