Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(alloc): policies of memory allocator #957

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Chillax-0v0
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 55.91%. Comparing base (c332510) to head (873d94e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #957      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     55.90%   55.91%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     1264     1265       +1     
============================================
  Files           133      133              
  Lines          8534     8534              
  Branches        789      789              
============================================
+ Hits           4771     4772       +1     
  Misses         3327     3327              
+ Partials        436      435       -1     
Components Coverage Δ
RocketMQ Broker ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Common 5.80% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Controller 57.39% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Proxy 37.18% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Store 73.65% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
RocketMQ Stream ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Metadata 35.44% <ø> (ø)

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@Chillax-0v0 Chillax-0v0 merged commit 7dcdb78 into main Mar 7, 2024
8 checks passed
@Chillax-0v0 Chillax-0v0 deleted the feat-allocator-policy branch March 7, 2024 12:22
Chillax-0v0 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2024
@Chillax-0v0 Chillax-0v0 restored the feat-allocator-policy branch March 8, 2024 04:36
@Chillax-0v0
Copy link
Contributor Author

redo in AutoMQ/automq#938

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants