Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Azure Blob Storage as storage backend for Persisted Operations #7777

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cimnine
Copy link
Contributor

@cimnine cimnine commented Nov 28, 2024

This PR proposes a new adapter to use Azure Blob Storage as storage backend for (automatically) persisted operations.

At least on Azure, Redis-compatible cache instances are comparably costly and mounting a shared filesystem is not always possible – and often not desired either. The Blob Storage on the other end is almost free.

Also, it's relatively easy to upload persisted operations extracted from a client in a CI/CD pipeline, whereas this is tricky with the existing options.

Please let me know if you're interested in including this as an officially supported storage backend. Otherwise, I will probably publish it independently.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 📚 documentation This issue is about working on our documentation. 🌶️ hot chocolate labels Nov 28, 2024
@michaelstaib
Copy link
Member

michaelstaib commented Nov 29, 2024

Hey @cimnine thanks for your contribution.

Tell us when you need a review.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.33%. Comparing base (c477e13) to head (3523687).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7777   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.32%   74.33%           
=======================================
  Files        2860     2864    +4     
  Lines      149842   149914   +72     
  Branches    17411    17421   +10     
=======================================
+ Hits       111373   111439   +66     
- Misses      32671    32674    +3     
- Partials     5798     5801    +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.33% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cimnine cimnine marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2024 19:45
@cimnine
Copy link
Contributor Author

cimnine commented Nov 30, 2024

@michaelstaib I believe now it would be ready for a first round of scrutiny.

@cimnine
Copy link
Contributor Author

cimnine commented Dec 15, 2024

@michaelstaib what are the next steps here?

@michaelstaib
Copy link
Member

I will have a look today

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📚 documentation This issue is about working on our documentation. 🌶️ hot chocolate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants