auto extend tests - sonnet-3.5

[mrT23]

PR Type

Tests

---

Description

• Added extensive tests across multiple modules to improve coverage and ensure robustness.
• Enhanced error handling tests for Azure DevOps and CodeCommit clients.
• Implemented tests for file filtering and patch handling logic.
• Extended tests for markdown conversion, configuration retrieval, and GitHub rate limit validation.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Tests

14 files test_azure_devops_parsing.py Add tests for Azure DevOps URL parsing and provider initialization tests/unittest/test_azure_devops_parsing.py Added pytest import for testing. Added test for provider initialization without dependencies. Added test for invalid PR URL handling. +13/-1    test_clip_tokens.py Extend tests for token clipping functionality                        tests/unittest/test_clip_tokens.py Added tests for clipping tokens with various scenarios. Tested negative tokens and empty text handling. +22/-0    test_codecommit_client.py Enhance CodeCommit client tests with error scenarios          tests/unittest/test_codecommit_client.py Added tests for error handling in CodeCommit client. Tested publishing comments and retrieving differences. +112/-0  test_codecommit_provider.py Add language detection test for CodeCommit provider            tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py Added test for language detection in CodeCommit provider. +24/-0    test_convert_to_markdown.py Extend markdown conversion and description processing tests tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py Added tests for processing descriptions and ticket markdown logic. Tested settings retrieval and markdown conversion. +46/-0    test_extend_patch.py Add test for patch extension skipping logic                            tests/unittest/test_extend_patch.py Added test for skipping patches by file extension. +25/-0    test_file_filter.py Enhance file filtering tests for multiple platforms            tests/unittest/test_file_filter.py Added tests for file filtering across different platforms. Tested regex and glob pattern handling. +90/-0    test_find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file.py Extend tests for line number detection in patches                tests/unittest/test_find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file.py Added tests for line number finding with whitespace and position matching. +25/-1    test_fix_output.py Add tests for configuration and GitHub rate limit handling tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py Added tests for configuration display and markdown conversion. Tested GitHub rate limit validation. +72/-0    test_github_action_output.py Extend tests for GitHub action output and token management tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py Added tests for GitHub action output and token handling. +30/-1    test_handle_patch_deletions.py Add test for byte decoding in patch handling                          tests/unittest/test_handle_patch_deletions.py Added test for decoding bytes with different encodings. +19/-0    test_language_handler.py Enhance language handler tests with file sorting and validation tests/unittest/test_language_handler.py Added tests for file sorting by language and extension validation. +52/-0    test_load_yaml.py Extend YAML loading tests with utility function coverage  tests/unittest/test_load_yaml.py Added tests for YAML loading and utility functions. Tested string conversion and uniqueness checks. +54/-0    test_parse_code_suggestion.py Add test for code suggestion parsing with invalid links    tests/unittest/test_parse_code_suggestion.py Added test for parsing code suggestions with invalid links. +10/-0

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🏅 Score: 85

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Error Handling Ensure that error handling for various AWS CodeCommit exceptions is comprehensive and consistent across all methods. Test Coverage Verify that all edge cases for file filtering across different platforms are adequately covered, including handling of various file extensions and paths. Configuration Dependency Review the dependency on global settings for extra bad extensions. Consider if this should be parameterized for better test isolation.

[mrT23]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to 91c6202

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Add a test case for handling IO errors in GitHub action output generation Add a test case to verify that the github_action_output function correctly handles the case when the output file cannot be written to due to permission issues or other IO errors. tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py [46-53] def test_github_action_output_error_case(self, monkeypatch, tmp_path): monkeypatch.setenv('GITHUB_OUTPUT', str(tmp_path / 'output')) output_data = None # invalid data key_name = 'key1' github_action_output(output_data, key_name) assert not os.path.exists(str(tmp_path / 'output')) +def test_github_action_output_io_error(self, monkeypatch, tmp_path): + monkeypatch.setenv('GITHUB_OUTPUT', str(tmp_path / 'output')) + output_data = {'key1': 'value1'} + key_name = 'key1' + + # Simulate permission error + with patch('builtins.open', side_effect=PermissionError): + github_action_output(output_data, key_name) + + assert not os.path.exists(str(tmp_path / 'output')) + Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion adds an important test case for handling IO errors, specifically permission errors, when writing GitHub action output. This significantly improves the test coverage and ensures the function behaves correctly under error conditions.	8
	Add error handling for the case when a pull request is not found during description publication Implement error handling for the case when the pull request does not exist in the publish_description method. This will improve the robustness of the code and provide more specific error messages. tests/unittest/test_codecommit_client.py [215-223] def test_publish_description_errors(self): api = CodeCommitClient() api.boto_client = MagicMock() # Test PR does not exist error_response = {'Error': {'Code': 'PullRequestDoesNotExistException'}} api.boto_client.update_pull_request_title.side_effect = botocore.exceptions.ClientError(error_response, 'operation') with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="PR number does not exist: 123"): api.publish_description(123, "title", "body") + + # Test PR not found + error_response = {'Error': {'Code': 'PullRequestNotFoundException'}} + api.boto_client.update_pull_request_title.side_effect = botocore.exceptions.ClientError(error_response, 'operation') + with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="PR not found: 123"): + api.publish_description(123, "title", "body") Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion adds a valuable test case for handling a specific error scenario (PullRequestNotFoundException) that was not previously covered. This improves the robustness of the test suite and ensures better error handling in the CodeCommitClient.	7

• Author self-review: I have reviewed the PR code suggestions, and addressed the relevant ones.

---

Previous suggestions

Suggestions up to commit 91c6202

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Use a context manager for boto3 client to ensure proper resource management Consider using a context manager (with statement) for the boto3 client to ensure proper resource cleanup. tests/unittest/test_codecommit_client.py [142-143] -api = CodeCommitClient() -api.boto_client = MagicMock() +with patch('boto3.client') as mock_boto3_client: + api = CodeCommitClient() + api.boto_client = mock_boto3_client.return_value Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Using a context manager ensures proper resource cleanup and is a best practice for managing external resources like API clients. This suggestion improves code reliability and resource management.	6
	Use more specific assertion methods for string comparisons in tests Consider using a more specific assertion for comparing strings, such as assertEqual or assertMultiLineEqual, instead of the generic assert statement. tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py [129] -assert result == expected +self.assertEqual(result, expected) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Using specific assertion methods like assertEqual or assertMultiLineEqual provides more informative error messages and is a best practice in unit testing. This improves test readability and debugging.	5
	Use more specific assertion methods in tests for improved readability and error messages Consider using a more specific assertion method, such as assertFalse, instead of the generic assert statement for checking file non-existence. tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py [53] -assert not os.path.exists(str(tmp_path / 'output')) +self.assertFalse(os.path.exists(str(tmp_path / 'output'))) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Using assertFalse instead of a generic assert statement provides more informative error messages and follows best practices in unit testing. This enhances test readability and debugging capabilities.	5
	Use more specific assertion methods for list comparisons in tests Consider using assertListEqual or assertEqual with a list comparison instead of the generic assert statement for comparing lists. tests/unittest/test_language_handler.py [173] -assert result == expected_output +self.assertListEqual(result, expected_output) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Using assertListEqual or assertEqual for list comparisons provides more detailed error messages and follows best practices in unit testing. This improves test clarity and makes debugging easier.	5

Suggestions up to commit 91c6202

Category	Suggestion	Score
General	Handle None input in the emphasize_header function to prevent exceptions Ensure that the emphasize_header function handles None input gracefully by returning the input unchanged. tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py [66-68] text = None # Invalid input that should trigger exception result = emphasize_header(text) -assert result == text # Should return input unchanged on error +assert result is None # Should return input unchanged on error Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential issue with handling None input in the emphasize_header function. The improved code ensures that the function returns None unchanged, which is a reasonable enhancement for robustness.	6

Suggestions up to commit 91c6202

Category	Suggestion	Score
Enhancement	Refactor error scenario tests using parameterization to improve maintainability and reduce code duplication Consider using a parameterized test for the different error scenarios in the test_publish_description_errors method to reduce code duplication and improve test maintainability. tests/unittest/test_codecommit_client.py [214-234] -def test_publish_description_errors(self): +@pytest.mark.parametrize("error_code, error_message", [ + ('PullRequestDoesNotExistException', "PR number does not exist: 123"), + ('InvalidTitleException', "Invalid title for PR number: 123"), + ('PullRequestAlreadyClosedException', "PR is already closed: PR number: 123") +]) +def test_publish_description_errors(self, error_code, error_message): api = CodeCommitClient() api.boto_client = MagicMock() - # Test PR does not exist - error_response = {'Error': {'Code': 'PullRequestDoesNotExistException'}} + error_response = {'Error': {'Code': error_code}} api.boto_client.update_pull_request_title.side_effect = botocore.exceptions.ClientError(error_response, 'operation') - with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="PR number does not exist: 123"): - api.publish_description(123, "title", "body") - - # Test invalid title - error_response = {'Error': {'Code': 'InvalidTitleException'}} - api.boto_client.update_pull_request_title.side_effect = botocore.exceptions.ClientError(error_response, 'operation') - with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Invalid title for PR number: 123"): - api.publish_description(123, "title", "body") - - # Test PR already closed - error_response = {'Error': {'Code': 'PullRequestAlreadyClosedException'}} - api.boto_client.update_pull_request_title.side_effect = botocore.exceptions.ClientError(error_response, 'operation') - with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="PR is already closed: PR number: 123"): + with pytest.raises(ValueError, match=error_message): api.publish_description(123, "title", "body") Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using parameterized tests for error scenarios reduces code duplication and enhances maintainability. This refactor is a significant improvement for the test suite's structure and readability.	8
	Add a test case for the boundary condition where max_tokens equals the input text length Consider adding a test case for the clip_tokens function with a max_tokens value equal to the length of the input text to ensure correct behavior at the boundary condition. tests/unittest/test_clip_tokens.py [10-19] def test_clip(self): text = "line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5\nline6" max_tokens = 25 result = clip_tokens(text, max_tokens) assert result == text max_tokens = 10 result = clip_tokens(text, max_tokens) expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\n\n...(truncated)' assert result == expected_results + # Test boundary condition + max_tokens = len(text) + result = clip_tokens(text, max_tokens) + assert result == text + Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding a test for the boundary condition where max_tokens equals the input text length is a valuable enhancement. It ensures the function behaves correctly at this edge case, improving test coverage.	7
	Expand test coverage for the try_fix_json function to include various error types and edge cases Consider adding more comprehensive tests for the try_fix_json function, including cases with different types of JSON errors and edge cases. tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py [72-79] def test_try_fix_json_with_code_suggestions(self): broken_json = '''{"review": {}, "Code feedback": [ {"suggestion": "test1"}, {"suggestion": "test2"}, {"suggestion": "test3"}, ''' result = try_fix_json(broken_json, code_suggestions=True) assert isinstance(result, dict) assert "review" in result + assert "Code feedback" in result + assert len(result["Code feedback"]) == 3 + # Test with missing closing bracket + broken_json2 = '{"key": "value"' + result2 = try_fix_json(broken_json2) + assert isinstance(result2, dict) + assert result2["key"] == "value" + + # Test with invalid JSON + invalid_json = 'This is not JSON' + result3 = try_fix_json(invalid_json) + assert result3 == invalid_json # Should return original string if unfixable + + # Test with empty string + empty_json = '' + result4 = try_fix_json(empty_json) + assert result4 == empty_json + Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion to add more comprehensive tests for try_fix_json is beneficial for ensuring robustness against different JSON errors. It enhances the function's reliability by covering more edge cases.	6
	Improve exception testing with a custom context manager for better readability and scope management Consider using a context manager with pytest.raises() for better readability and to ensure the exception is raised in the correct scope. tests/unittest/test_azure_devops_parsing.py [20-21] -with pytest.raises(ImportError, match="Azure DevOps provider is not available"): +from contextlib import contextmanager + +@contextmanager +def assert_raises_import_error(): + with pytest.raises(ImportError, match="Azure DevOps provider is not available"): + yield + +with assert_raises_import_error(): AzureDevopsProvider() Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3 Why: The suggestion introduces a custom context manager for handling exceptions, which could improve readability. However, it adds unnecessary complexity for a simple test case, making it less practical.	3