Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix EnigmaMappings parsing #903

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

Janmm14
Copy link
Contributor

@Janmm14 Janmm14 commented Jan 8, 2025

What's new

What's fixed

  • inner classes are now prefixed with outer class(es)

The parser now only supports tab indents (as per enigma mappings specification) , no longer other characters trim is removing (ascii code points < 19 no longer regarded as tab.

…mprove

# Conflicts:
#	recaf-core/src/test/java/software/coley/recaf/services/mapping/format/MappingImplementationTest.java
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.34483% with 46 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 64.66%. Comparing base (928d97b) to head (9cdf6ed).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../recaf/services/mapping/format/EnigmaMappings.java 60.34% 23 Missing and 23 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #903      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     64.68%   64.66%   -0.03%     
- Complexity     3121     3141      +20     
============================================
  Files           375      375              
  Lines         15736    15803      +67     
  Branches       2228     2244      +16     
============================================
+ Hits          10179    10219      +40     
- Misses         4520     4531      +11     
- Partials       1037     1053      +16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Col-E
Copy link
Owner

Col-E commented Jan 8, 2025

Had some local changes which confused github, but this is merged now 👍

@Col-E Col-E closed this Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants