Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix old type change that was incorrect. #5

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

grimwm
Copy link

@grimwm grimwm commented Jun 26, 2020

Old repofile.content change from LONGTEXT to TEXT was too
restrictive, resulting in failures in testing when existing
seed data was too large. MEDIUMTEXT is more reasonable
then LONGTEXT while still allowing quite large sizes.

This change has been applied twice so that users out
there that had applied the older change can stay in-sync.

Old repofile.content change from LONGTEXT to TEXT was too
restrictive, resulting in failures in testing when existing
seed data was too large.  MEDIUMTEXT is more reasonable
then LONGTEXT while still allowing quite large sizes.

This change has been applied twice so that users out
there that had applied the older change can stay in-sync.
@krystofurr
Copy link

krystofurr commented Sep 15, 2021

Recently our team found a possibly related issue to this change.

In order to make this modification to the database, I believe that there are 'diffjson' columns scattered throughout many tables that need to be altered as well. We found an issue when you go to apply a security group to a file that has a large size. It will not apply the security group due to the 'diffjson' column being too small and give an unrelated error message of something like " There are keys already related to this key ".

We updated every diffjson column from TEXT to MEDIUMTEXT in order to get by this issue.

@krystofurr
Copy link

Any update on this ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants