Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Language and mathematical standardizations #22

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Dec 21, 2018
Merged

Conversation

jmason42
Copy link
Contributor

This addresses #10, #16, and #19. I also slightly redesigned the propensity recalculation logic, as it was recomputing some propensities multiple times in the same step, and it was also recomputing propensities even if only the product abundances changed.

Copy link
Member

@prismofeverything prismofeverything left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @jmason42, looks good, thanks for setting this up! Though I see we clash on a few stylistic/semantic points. Let's resolve these in a copacetic way : )

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
arrow/arrow.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
arrow/arrow.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jmason42
Copy link
Contributor Author

These changes should address your concerns. I went with time_current in place of t and time_to_next in place of dt, both of which are clumsy but at least clearer and more consistent.

@prismofeverything
Copy link
Member

Awesome, thanks for this! I'll roll it into a new release.

@prismofeverything prismofeverything merged commit 91041e4 into master Dec 21, 2018
@1fish2 1fish2 deleted the standardization branch December 10, 2024 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants