Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix /condalock command #58

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2023

Conversation

MattF-NSIDC
Copy link

@MattF-NSIDC MattF-NSIDC commented May 10, 2023

It was broken by a release of urllib 2.x which was incompatible with cachecontrol. A future release of cachecontrol may add this pin to its own dependencies or otherwise fix the incompatibility, at which time the hacky pin can be removed.

Closes #57

It was broken by a release of `urllib 2.x` which was incompatible with
`cachecontrol`. A future release of `cachecontrol` may add this pin to
its own dependencies or otherwise fix the incompatibility, at which time
the hacky pin can be removed.
@MattF-NSIDC MattF-NSIDC requested a review from weiji14 May 10, 2023 19:49
@github-actions
Copy link

Binder 👈 Test this PR on Binder

@MattF-NSIDC
Copy link
Author

MattF-NSIDC commented May 10, 2023

Closes #57 Keep forgetting this has to be in the PR description

@MattF-NSIDC
Copy link
Author

I don't think we can test this until it's merged. Should we merge this and then test it on the other open PR? Or is there a way to test GH Actions workflows on a branch? 🤔

Copy link
Member

@weiji14 weiji14 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, let's merge this in first to test. Should be ok looking at the related thread at psf/cachecontrol#292.

@MattF-NSIDC
Copy link
Author

I also tested installing the dependencies with that pip command and was able to do a lock locally afterwards.

@MattF-NSIDC MattF-NSIDC merged commit 9753269 into CryoInTheCloud:main May 10, 2023
@MattF-NSIDC MattF-NSIDC deleted the fix-condalock-cmd branch May 10, 2023 20:10
@weiji14
Copy link
Member

weiji14 commented May 10, 2023

Cool, the bot pushed commit ab2ffe8 in #56 so this definitely works 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

/condalock action is failing
3 participants