Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port to Linux platforms that use musl-libc instead of glibc #2275

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 12, 2024

Conversation

mitza-oci
Copy link
Member

Based on #1072 from @drandreas with help from the patch attached to #914

drandreas and others added 7 commits May 12, 2020 13:21
ACE_Dev_Poll_Reactor is using __uint32_t for no apparent
reason. Since struct epoll_event.events is defined as
uint32_t and using __uint32_t breaks compatibility
with musl, __uint32_t should be replaced with uint32_t.
But to conform with ACE Guidelines I'm using ACE_UINT32.
@mitza-oci mitza-oci linked an issue Aug 9, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
ACE/ace/os_include/sys/os_types.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mitza-oci mitza-oci merged commit caeb545 into DOCGroup:master Aug 12, 2024
45 checks passed
@mitza-oci mitza-oci deleted the musl branch August 12, 2024 14:20
@mitza-oci
Copy link
Member Author

@Mergifyio backport ace6tao2

Copy link

mergify bot commented Aug 12, 2024

backport ace6tao2

❌ No backport have been created

  • Backport to branch ace6tao2 failed

Git reported the following error:

error: commit a202757e6e15050cb97715b8b3beefe1cb67f325 is a merge but no -m option was given.
fatal: cherry-pick failed

mitza-oci added a commit to mitza-oci/ACE_TAO that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2024
Port to Linux platforms that use musl-libc instead of glibc

(cherry picked from commit caeb545)

# Conflicts:
#	ACE/ace/os_include/sys/os_types.h
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Any plans to support musl libc?
4 participants