Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved support on Windows platforms with differing IPv4/IPv6 support #954

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wkbrd
Copy link
Contributor

@wkbrd wkbrd commented Aug 29, 2019

Improved support on Windows platforms with differing IPv4/IPv6 support, including over network segments. It was found that on Windows sometimes IPv4 traffic would not connect due to the results of name lookups.

This change corrects this behavior and we have been utilizing the same patched files on both Windows and Linux.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced network address resolution now gracefully evaluates multiple address options, providing improved connectivity.
    • Improved support for Windows ensures smoother, more compatible network operations.

@wkbrd
Copy link
Contributor Author

wkbrd commented Sep 10, 2019

Hi @jwillemsen, what is the process for having this pull request be considered? Does the code complexity (CodeFactor) need to be addressed or can it be accepted by a project team member's review?

@iguessthislldo
Copy link
Member

The complex method complaint is normal and personally I think it's being over zealous in this case since the function is only about 120 lines long, although it's probably counting the possible code paths. As for acceptance, it's not directly based on what checks are saying, someone who with free time will have to review it.

@jwillemsen
Copy link
Member

jwillemsen commented Sep 10, 2019

Acceptance requires a detailed review which depens on available time. Also the person who merges a PR implicitly commits to check all builds to watch for any regression. All together it takes several hours for one PR, see also https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/DOCGroup/ACE_TAO/blob/master/ACE/docs/ACE-bug-process.html

@jwillemsen jwillemsen added the needs review Needs to be reviewed label May 7, 2020
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes modify the address resolution logic in the ACE_INET_Addr::set methods. The update replaces a single-pass loop with a two-pass approach, enabling the method to first check for addresses matching the specified family and then consider alternative families if needed. Additionally, the assignment of hints.ai_family is now conditionally set to AF_UNSPEC on Windows, ensuring better cross-platform compatibility. The method signatures remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
ACE/ace/INET_Addr.cpp Modified ACE_INET_Addr::set logic: replaced single-pass address loop with a two-pass algorithm checking same family then alternatives; conditional Windows fix for hints.ai_family assignment.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant ACE_INET_Addr
    Note over ACE_INET_Addr: First pass: Check addresses matching specified family.
    Caller->>ACE_INET_Addr: set(address, address_family)
    ACE_INET_Addr->>ACE_INET_Addr: Loop through address info (first pass)
    alt Matching address found
        ACE_INET_Addr->>Caller: Return success with matching address
    else No matching address found
        Note over ACE_INET_Addr: Second pass: Check alternative families.
        ACE_INET_Addr->>ACE_INET_Addr: Loop through address info (second pass)
        ACE_INET_Addr->>Caller: Return success or failure based on alternative match
    end
Loading

Poem

In a burrow of code so deep,
I hopped along without a peep.
First, I scanned for family true,
Then ventured out for something new.
Oh, code carrots so crisp and fun,
A rabbit’s joy when changes are done!
🥕🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c3ca3f and 778724c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ACE/ace/INET_Addr.cpp (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 g++-10 CodeQL
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 g++-10 ACE for TAO
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 g++-10 CORBA/e compact
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 g++-10 CORBA/e micro
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-22.04 clang++-16
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-22.04 clang++-15
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-22.04 clang++-14
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 clang++-13
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 clang++-12
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 clang++-11
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 clang++-10
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 clang++-9
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 clang++-8
  • GitHub Check: VS2022Debug64
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 clang++-7
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 clang++-6.0
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-22.04 g++-12
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-22.04 g++-11
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-20.04 g++-10
  • GitHub Check: alpine-3.18
🔇 Additional comments (2)
ACE/ace/INET_Addr.cpp (2)

398-402: LGTM! Platform-specific handling for Windows address family selection.

The conditional setting of hints.ai_family to AF_UNSPEC on Windows while using the provided address_family on other platforms is a good approach to handle Windows-specific IPv4/IPv6 connectivity issues.


433-453: LGTM! Robust two-pass approach for address resolution.

The implementation of a two-pass approach for processing address information is well-structured and provides better handling of IPv4/IPv6 addresses by:

  1. Prioritizing addresses that match the requested family in the first pass
  2. Considering alternative address families in the second pass
  3. Correctly updating the address family when a matching one is found
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs review Needs to be reviewed
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants