Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[test-infra-definitions][automated] Bump test-infra-definitions to a27cd6e045507770c3cf95f45ff8583e9e2001f3 #33732

Closed

Conversation

agent-platform-auto-pr[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was automatically created by the test-infra-definitions bump task.

This PR bumps the test-infra-definitions submodule to a27cd6e045507770c3cf95f45ff8583e9e2001f3 from 5ce0da569ade.
Here is the full changelog between the two commits: DataDog/test-infra-definitions@5ce0da5...a27cd6e

⚠️ This PR is opened with the qa/no-code-change and changelog/no-changelog labels by default. Please make sure this is appropriate

@agent-platform-auto-pr agent-platform-auto-pr bot requested review from a team as code owners February 5, 2025 13:25
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Feb 5, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 844.87MiB 858.45MiB 203.53MiB 214.3MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 929.14MiB 942.69MiB 310.7MiB 321.56MiB

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor Author

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 54970945 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor c741f9294366fdf079a225799173e81b1d521365

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 873.45MB 873.45MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 883.19MB 883.19MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 883.19MB 883.19MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 861.34MB 861.34MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 871.06MB 871.06MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 59.09MB 59.09MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 59.16MB 59.16MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 59.16MB 59.16MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 56.56MB 56.56MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 445.70MB 445.70MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 86.23MB 86.23MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 86.30MB 86.30MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 86.30MB 86.30MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 82.50MB 82.50MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 82.57MB 82.57MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: c084a4bb-4672-4900-92e7-5294f4d3dcf2

Baseline: c741f92
Comparison: 0600b84
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +2.64 [+1.73, +3.54] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +1.23 [+1.15, +1.31] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.43 [+0.36, +0.50] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.22 [+0.15, +0.29] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +0.22 [-2.82, +3.25] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.20 [-0.59, +0.99] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.14 [-0.71, +0.99] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.05 [-0.76, +0.86] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.05 [-0.59, +0.69] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.03 [-0.89, +0.95] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.66, +0.72] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.00 [-0.04, +0.05] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.29, +0.28] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.92, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.16 [-0.63, +0.31] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing PR since it is considered stale compared to #33784. If you really want to merge this PR feel free to re-open it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automatic/test-infra-bump changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants