Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add jmx, dogstatsd, cluster-agent and arm64 images static quality gates #33754

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

Pythyu
Copy link
Contributor

@Pythyu Pythyu commented Feb 5, 2025

What does this PR do?

Add static quality gates for arm64, jmx, dogstatsd and cluster-agent agent images

Motivation

RFC: P2 docker static quality gates

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@Pythyu Pythyu added changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Feb 5, 2025
@Pythyu Pythyu requested a review from a team as a code owner February 5, 2025 16:44
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Feb 5, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Feb 5, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Gitlab CI Configuration Changes

Modified Jobs

static_quality_gates
  static_quality_gates:
    allow_failure: true
    image: registry.ddbuild.io/ci/datadog-agent-buildimages/docker_x64$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES_SUFFIX:$DATADOG_AGENT_BUILDIMAGES
    needs:
    - artifacts: true
      job: agent_deb-x64-a7
    - artifacts: true
      job: docker_build_agent7
+   - artifacts: true
+     job: docker_build_agent7_arm64
+   - artifacts: true
+     job: docker_build_agent7_jmx
+   - artifacts: true
+     job: docker_build_agent7_jmx_arm64
+   - artifacts: true
+     job: docker_build_cluster_agent_amd64
+   - artifacts: true
+     job: docker_build_cluster_agent_arm64
    rules:
    - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
      when: never
    - if: $CI_COMMIT_TAG != null
      when: never
    - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
      when: never
    - when: on_success
    script:
    - DOCKER_LOGIN=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $DOCKER_REGISTRY_RO user)
      || exit $?
    - $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $DOCKER_REGISTRY_RO token | crane auth
      login --username "$DOCKER_LOGIN" --password-stdin "$DOCKER_REGISTRY_URL"
    - EXIT="${PIPESTATUS[0]}"; if [ $EXIT -ne 0 ]; then echo "Unable to locate credentials
      needs gitlab runner restart"; exit $EXIT; fi
    - DATADOG_API_KEY="$("$CI_PROJECT_DIR"/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh "$AGENT_API_KEY_ORG2"
      token)" || exit $?; export DATADOG_API_KEY
    - export DD_API_KEY="$DATADOG_API_KEY"
    - GITHUB_KEY_B64=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP key_b64)
      || exit $?; export GITHUB_KEY_B64
    - GITHUB_APP_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP app_id)
      || exit $?; export GITHUB_APP_ID
    - GITHUB_INSTALLATION_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_GITHUB_APP
      installation_id) || exit $?; export GITHUB_INSTALLATION_ID
    - echo "Using agent GitHub App"
    - inv quality-gates.parse-and-trigger-gates
    stage: functional_test
    tags:
    - arch:amd64

Changes Summary

Removed Modified Added Renamed
0 1 0 0

ℹ️ Diff available in the job log.

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 5, 2025

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 55266373 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 909942b64fda2a3bdb7f79562115cde9e3cacd94

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 873.70MB 873.70MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 883.44MB 883.44MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 883.44MB 883.44MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 861.58MB 861.58MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 59.10MB 59.10MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 59.18MB 59.18MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 59.18MB 59.18MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 56.57MB 56.57MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 445.90MB 445.90MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 86.37MB 86.37MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 86.44MB 86.44MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 86.44MB 86.44MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 82.64MB 82.64MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 82.71MB 82.71MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm -0.00MB 871.30MB 871.30MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 1992498c-20be-495e-84f1-7105f3b5e5d2

Baseline: 909942b
Comparison: acf4a26
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +1.03 [-2.05, +4.10] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.18 [-0.72, +1.09] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.17 [+0.12, +0.21] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.08 [-0.82, +0.99] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.60, +0.66] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.03 [-0.25, +0.31] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.02, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput -0.01 [-0.90, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.65, +0.62] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.03 [-0.10, +0.04] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.10 [-0.57, +0.37] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.12 [-0.91, +0.66] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.37 [-0.42, -0.31] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.43 [-1.29, +0.44] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.79 [-1.57, -0.00] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -1.17 [-1.24, -1.10] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@Pythyu Pythyu requested review from a team as code owners February 6, 2025 13:02
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from agent-platform-auto-pr bot Feb 7, 2025
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from agent-platform-auto-pr bot Feb 7, 2025
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from agent-platform-auto-pr bot Feb 7, 2025
@Pythyu Pythyu changed the title Add arm64 and jmx images static quality gates Add jmx, dogstatsd, cluster-agent and arm64 images static quality gates Feb 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@CelianR CelianR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some NITs to clean the previous code 👍

tasks/static_quality_gates/lib/docker_agent_lib.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tasks/static_quality_gates/lib/docker_agent_lib.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tasks/static_quality_gates/lib/docker_agent_lib.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from agent-platform-auto-pr bot Feb 7, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 844.56MiB 858.45MiB 203.61MiB 214.3MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 929.36MiB 942.69MiB 310.74MiB 321.56MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 941.12MiB 952.69MiB 294.5MiB 351.22MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.1GiB 1.11GiB 385.83MiB 395.8MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.1GiB 1.11GiB 365.58MiB 375.5MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 47.89MiB 57.88MiB 18.3MiB 28.29MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 46.27MiB 56.27MiB 17.06MiB 27.06MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 267.75MiB 277.7MiB 107.29MiB 117.28MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 283.77MiB 293.73MiB 102.13MiB 112.12MiB

@Pythyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pythyu commented Feb 10, 2025

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2025-02-10 08:29:37 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 29m.


2025-02-10 08:57:41 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 9895bca into main Feb 10, 2025
228 of 230 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the pythyu/arm_and_jmx_docker_gates branch February 10, 2025 08:57
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.64.0 milestone Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog medium review PR review might take time qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants