Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(botocore): ensure streamed bedrock spans finish [backport #11499 to 2.15] #11510

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

Yun-Kim
Copy link
Contributor

@Yun-Kim Yun-Kim commented Nov 22, 2024

Backport #11499 to 2.15.

Fixes #11295.

There was an issue with the langchain-aws library and our bedrock integration in that langchain-aws' ChatBedrock class was actually resulting in a GeneratorExit because of this
code
implicitly calling close(stream) under the hood in Python. this means that any post-processor
code
was actually never reached. Since GeneratorExits do not inherit from Exception (they actually inherit from BaseException), this was not caught in our except Except block, meaning spans never went through either of our post-processing (success or error) code.

The solution is to move post processing code into a finally block, to ensure that spans will always be finished. Note that GeneratorExits are not indicative of actual user/system errors and will not be flagged as such (spans will not be marked with error, post processing will simply include only information available until the last yielded chunk)

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

Fixes #11295.

There was an issue with the langchain-aws library and our bedrock
integration in that langchain-aws' ChatBedrock class was actually
resulting in a GeneratorExit because of [this
code](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/blob/f173b72e35979b842933774c9c4568c329a0ae8a/libs/core/langchain_core/language_models/chat_models.py#L88-L90)
implicitly calling close(stream) under the hood in Python. this means
that any [post-processor
code](https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-py/blob/a664aab0a9d53e8dbb874d68933613de4cbecb1d/ddtrace/contrib/internal/botocore/services/bedrock.py#L84-L94)
was actually never reached. Since GeneratorExits do not inherit from
Exception (they actually inherit from BaseException), this was not
caught in our `except Except` block, meaning spans never went through
either of our post-processing (success or error) code.

The solution is to move post processing code into a finally block, to
ensure that spans will always be finished. Note that GeneratorExits are
not indicative of actual user/system errors and will not be flagged as
such (spans will not be marked with error, post processing will simply
include only information available until the last yielded chunk)

- [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
- The PR description includes an overview of the change
- The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
- The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing
strategy
- The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- The change follows the [library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
- The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
- Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))

- [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
- Title is accurate
- All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance
implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)
Copy link
Contributor

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

releasenotes/notes/fix-bedrock-early-stream-exit-81da39d97fb1b26e.yaml  @DataDog/apm-python
ddtrace/contrib/internal/botocore/services/bedrock.py                   @DataDog/ml-observability
tests/contrib/botocore/test_bedrock.py                                  @DataDog/ml-observability

@Yun-Kim Yun-Kim enabled auto-merge (squash) November 22, 2024 18:54
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: yunkim/backport-11499-215
Commit report: 689ddf1
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 592 Passed, 694 Skipped, 18m 43.39s Total duration (16m 6.06s time saved)

@Yun-Kim Yun-Kim merged commit 6505be5 into 2.15 Nov 22, 2024
645 of 648 checks passed
@Yun-Kim Yun-Kim deleted the yunkim/backport-11499-215 branch November 22, 2024 21:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants