Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
build based on 93458e2
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
Documenter.jl committed Oct 28, 2024
1 parent 5756820 commit 2e87c88
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 31 changed files with 36 additions and 36 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion previews/PR490/changelog/index.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion previews/PR490/index.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion previews/PR490/intro/publications/index.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion previews/PR490/intro/use_cases/index.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion previews/PR490/model_docs/intro/index.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions previews/PR490/model_docs/lateral/gwf/index.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion previews/PR490/model_docs/lateral/kinwave/index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,4 +24,4 @@
pits = "wflow_pits"

[model]
pits = true</code></pre><h2 id="Limitations"><a class="docs-heading-anchor" href="#Limitations">Limitations</a><a id="Limitations-1"></a><a class="docs-heading-anchor-permalink" href="#Limitations" title="Permalink"></a></h2><p>The kinematic wave approach for channel, overland and lateral subsurface flow, assumes that the topography controls water flow mostly. This assumption holds for steep terrain, but in less steep terrain the hydraulic gradient is likely not equal to the surface slope (subsurface flow), or pressure differences and inertial momentum cannot be neglected (channel and overland flow). In addition, while the kinematic wave equations are solved with a nonlinear scheme using Newton&#39;s method (Chow, 1988), other model equations are solved through a simple explicit scheme. In summary the following limitations apply:</p><ul><li><p>Channel flow, and to a lesser degree overland flow, may be unrealistic in terrain that is not steep, and where pressure forces and inertial momentum are important.</p></li><li><p>The lateral movement of subsurface flow may be very wrong in terrain that is not steep.</p></li></ul><h2 id="External-inflows"><a class="docs-heading-anchor" href="#External-inflows">External inflows</a><a id="External-inflows-1"></a><a class="docs-heading-anchor-permalink" href="#External-inflows" title="Permalink"></a></h2><p>External inflows, for example water supply or abstractions, can be added to the kinematic wave via the <code>inflow</code> variable. For this, the user can supply a 2D map of the inflow, as a cyclic parameter or as part of forcing (see also <a href="../../../user_guide/step2_settings_file/#Input-section">Input section</a>). These inflows are added or abstracted from the upstream inflow <code>qin</code> before running the kinematic wave to solve the impact on resulting <code>q</code>. In case of a negative inflow (abstractions), a minimum of zero is applied to the upstream flow <code>qin</code>.</p><h2 id="References"><a class="docs-heading-anchor" href="#References">References</a><a id="References-1"></a><a class="docs-heading-anchor-permalink" href="#References" title="Permalink"></a></h2><ul><li>Chow, V., Maidment, D. and Mays, L., 1988, Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.</li></ul></article><nav class="docs-footer"><a class="docs-footer-prevpage" href="../gwf/">« Groundwater flow</a><a class="docs-footer-nextpage" href="../local-inertial/">Local inertial »</a><div class="flexbox-break"></div><p class="footer-message">Powered by <a href="https://github.com/JuliaDocs/Documenter.jl">Documenter.jl</a> and the <a href="https://julialang.org/">Julia Programming Language</a>.</p></nav></div><div class="modal" id="documenter-settings"><div class="modal-background"></div><div class="modal-card"><header class="modal-card-head"><p class="modal-card-title">Settings</p><button class="delete"></button></header><section class="modal-card-body"><p><label class="label">Theme</label><div class="select"><select id="documenter-themepicker"><option value="documenter-light">documenter-light</option><option value="documenter-dark">documenter-dark</option></select></div></p><hr/><p>This document was generated with <a href="https://github.com/JuliaDocs/Documenter.jl">Documenter.jl</a> version 0.27.25 on <span class="colophon-date" title="Monday 28 October 2024 13:47">Monday 28 October 2024</span>. Using Julia version 1.11.0.</p></section><footer class="modal-card-foot"></footer></div></div></div></body></html>
pits = true</code></pre><h2 id="Limitations"><a class="docs-heading-anchor" href="#Limitations">Limitations</a><a id="Limitations-1"></a><a class="docs-heading-anchor-permalink" href="#Limitations" title="Permalink"></a></h2><p>The kinematic wave approach for channel, overland and lateral subsurface flow, assumes that the topography controls water flow mostly. This assumption holds for steep terrain, but in less steep terrain the hydraulic gradient is likely not equal to the surface slope (subsurface flow), or pressure differences and inertial momentum cannot be neglected (channel and overland flow). In addition, while the kinematic wave equations are solved with a nonlinear scheme using Newton&#39;s method (Chow, 1988), other model equations are solved through a simple explicit scheme. In summary the following limitations apply:</p><ul><li><p>Channel flow, and to a lesser degree overland flow, may be unrealistic in terrain that is not steep, and where pressure forces and inertial momentum are important.</p></li><li><p>The lateral movement of subsurface flow may be very wrong in terrain that is not steep.</p></li></ul><h2 id="External-inflows"><a class="docs-heading-anchor" href="#External-inflows">External inflows</a><a id="External-inflows-1"></a><a class="docs-heading-anchor-permalink" href="#External-inflows" title="Permalink"></a></h2><p>External inflows, for example water supply or abstractions, can be added to the kinematic wave via the <code>inflow</code> variable. For this, the user can supply a 2D map of the inflow, as a cyclic parameter or as part of forcing (see also <a href="../../../user_guide/step2_settings_file/#Input-section">Input section</a>). These inflows are added or abstracted from the upstream inflow <code>qin</code> before running the kinematic wave to solve the impact on resulting <code>q</code>. In case of a negative inflow (abstractions), a minimum of zero is applied to the upstream flow <code>qin</code>.</p><h2 id="References"><a class="docs-heading-anchor" href="#References">References</a><a id="References-1"></a><a class="docs-heading-anchor-permalink" href="#References" title="Permalink"></a></h2><ul><li>Chow, V., Maidment, D. and Mays, L., 1988, Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.</li></ul></article><nav class="docs-footer"><a class="docs-footer-prevpage" href="../gwf/">« Groundwater flow</a><a class="docs-footer-nextpage" href="../local-inertial/">Local inertial »</a><div class="flexbox-break"></div><p class="footer-message">Powered by <a href="https://github.com/JuliaDocs/Documenter.jl">Documenter.jl</a> and the <a href="https://julialang.org/">Julia Programming Language</a>.</p></nav></div><div class="modal" id="documenter-settings"><div class="modal-background"></div><div class="modal-card"><header class="modal-card-head"><p class="modal-card-title">Settings</p><button class="delete"></button></header><section class="modal-card-body"><p><label class="label">Theme</label><div class="select"><select id="documenter-themepicker"><option value="documenter-light">documenter-light</option><option value="documenter-dark">documenter-dark</option></select></div></p><hr/><p>This document was generated with <a href="https://github.com/JuliaDocs/Documenter.jl">Documenter.jl</a> version 0.27.25 on <span class="colophon-date" title="Monday 28 October 2024 13:55">Monday 28 October 2024</span>. Using Julia version 1.11.0.</p></section><footer class="modal-card-foot"></footer></div></div></div></body></html>
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions previews/PR490/model_docs/lateral/local-inertial/index.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion previews/PR490/model_docs/lateral/sediment_flux/index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -39,4 +39,4 @@
# Lake
lakearea = &quot;LakeArea&quot;
lakeareas = &quot;wflow_lakeareas&quot;
lakelocs = &quot;wflow_lakelocs&quot;</code></pre><p>Note that in the inland part, lake and reservoir coverage are used to filter erosion and transport in overland flow.</p><h2 id="References"><a class="docs-heading-anchor" href="#References">References</a><a id="References-1"></a><a class="docs-heading-anchor-permalink" href="#References" title="Permalink"></a></h2><ul><li>K.C. Abbaspour, J. Yang, I. Maximov, R. Siber, K. Bogner, J. Mieleitner, J. Zobrist, and R.Srinivasan. Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 333(2-4):413-430, 2007. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014</li><li>P. Borrelli, M. Märker, P. Panagos, and B. Schütt. Modeling soil erosion and river sediment yield for an intermountain drainage basin of the Central Apennines, Italy. Catena, 114:45-58, 2014. 10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.007</li><li>F. Engelund and E. Hansen. A monograph on sediment transport in alluvial streams. Technical University of Denmark 0stervoldgade 10, Copenhagen K., 1967.</li><li>G. Govers. Empirical relationships for the transport capacity of overland flow. IAHS Publication, (January 1990):45-63 ST, 1990.</li><li>G.J Hanson and A Simon. Erodibility of cohesive streambeds in the loess area of the midwestern USA. Hydrological Processes, 15(May 1999):23-38, 2001.</li><li>R Hessel and V Jetten. Suitability of transport equations in modelling soil erosion for a small Loess Plateau catchment. Engineering Geology, 91(1):56-71, 2007. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.12.013</li><li>J.P Julian, and R. Torres. Hydraulic erosion of cohesive riverbanks. Geomorphology, 76:193-206, 2006. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.11.003</li><li>D.W. Knight, J.D. Demetriou, and M.E. Hamed. Boundary Shear in Smooth Rectangular Channels. J. Hydraul. Eng., 110(4):405-422, 1984. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1987)113:1(120)</li><li>S.L Neitsch, J.G Arnold, J.R Kiniry, and J.R Williams. SWAT Theoretical Documentation Version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute, pages 1-647, 2011. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.063</li><li>C. Oeurng, S. Sauvage, and J.M. Sanchez-Perez. Assessment of hydrology, sediment and particulate organic carbon yield in a large agricultural catchment using the SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology, 401:145-153, 2011. 10.1016/j.hydrol.2011.02.017</li><li>A. Simon, N. Pollen-Bankhead, and R.E Thomas. Development and application of a deterministic bank stability and toe erosion model for stream restoration. Geophysical Monograph Series, 194:453-474, 2011. 10.1029/2010GM001006</li><li>G. Verstraeten and J. Poesen. Estimating trap efficiency of small reservoirs and ponds: methods and implications for the assessment of sediment yield. Progress in Physical Geography, 24(2):219-251, 2000. 10.1177/030913330002400204</li><li>O. Vigiak, A. Malago, F. Bouraoui, M. Vanmaercke, and J. Poesen. Adapting SWAT hillslope erosion model to predict sediment concentrations and yields in large Basins. Science of the Total Environment, 538:855-875, 2015. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.095</li><li>O. Vigiak, A. Malago, F. Bouraoui, M. Vanmaercke, F. Obreja, J. Poesen, H. Habersack, J. Feher, and S. Groselj. Modelling sediment fluxes in the Danube River Basin with SWAT. Science of the Total Environment, 2017. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.236</li></ul></article><nav class="docs-footer"><a class="docs-footer-prevpage" href="../waterbodies/">« Reservoirs and Lakes</a><a class="docs-footer-nextpage" href="../../params_vertical/">Parameters vertical concepts »</a><div class="flexbox-break"></div><p class="footer-message">Powered by <a href="https://github.com/JuliaDocs/Documenter.jl">Documenter.jl</a> and the <a href="https://julialang.org/">Julia Programming Language</a>.</p></nav></div><div class="modal" id="documenter-settings"><div class="modal-background"></div><div class="modal-card"><header class="modal-card-head"><p class="modal-card-title">Settings</p><button class="delete"></button></header><section class="modal-card-body"><p><label class="label">Theme</label><div class="select"><select id="documenter-themepicker"><option value="documenter-light">documenter-light</option><option value="documenter-dark">documenter-dark</option></select></div></p><hr/><p>This document was generated with <a href="https://github.com/JuliaDocs/Documenter.jl">Documenter.jl</a> version 0.27.25 on <span class="colophon-date" title="Monday 28 October 2024 13:47">Monday 28 October 2024</span>. Using Julia version 1.11.0.</p></section><footer class="modal-card-foot"></footer></div></div></div></body></html>
lakelocs = &quot;wflow_lakelocs&quot;</code></pre><p>Note that in the inland part, lake and reservoir coverage are used to filter erosion and transport in overland flow.</p><h2 id="References"><a class="docs-heading-anchor" href="#References">References</a><a id="References-1"></a><a class="docs-heading-anchor-permalink" href="#References" title="Permalink"></a></h2><ul><li>K.C. Abbaspour, J. Yang, I. Maximov, R. Siber, K. Bogner, J. Mieleitner, J. Zobrist, and R.Srinivasan. Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 333(2-4):413-430, 2007. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014</li><li>P. Borrelli, M. Märker, P. Panagos, and B. Schütt. Modeling soil erosion and river sediment yield for an intermountain drainage basin of the Central Apennines, Italy. Catena, 114:45-58, 2014. 10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.007</li><li>F. Engelund and E. Hansen. A monograph on sediment transport in alluvial streams. Technical University of Denmark 0stervoldgade 10, Copenhagen K., 1967.</li><li>G. Govers. Empirical relationships for the transport capacity of overland flow. IAHS Publication, (January 1990):45-63 ST, 1990.</li><li>G.J Hanson and A Simon. Erodibility of cohesive streambeds in the loess area of the midwestern USA. Hydrological Processes, 15(May 1999):23-38, 2001.</li><li>R Hessel and V Jetten. Suitability of transport equations in modelling soil erosion for a small Loess Plateau catchment. Engineering Geology, 91(1):56-71, 2007. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.12.013</li><li>J.P Julian, and R. Torres. Hydraulic erosion of cohesive riverbanks. Geomorphology, 76:193-206, 2006. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.11.003</li><li>D.W. Knight, J.D. Demetriou, and M.E. Hamed. Boundary Shear in Smooth Rectangular Channels. J. Hydraul. Eng., 110(4):405-422, 1984. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1987)113:1(120)</li><li>S.L Neitsch, J.G Arnold, J.R Kiniry, and J.R Williams. SWAT Theoretical Documentation Version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute, pages 1-647, 2011. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.063</li><li>C. Oeurng, S. Sauvage, and J.M. Sanchez-Perez. Assessment of hydrology, sediment and particulate organic carbon yield in a large agricultural catchment using the SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology, 401:145-153, 2011. 10.1016/j.hydrol.2011.02.017</li><li>A. Simon, N. Pollen-Bankhead, and R.E Thomas. Development and application of a deterministic bank stability and toe erosion model for stream restoration. Geophysical Monograph Series, 194:453-474, 2011. 10.1029/2010GM001006</li><li>G. Verstraeten and J. Poesen. Estimating trap efficiency of small reservoirs and ponds: methods and implications for the assessment of sediment yield. Progress in Physical Geography, 24(2):219-251, 2000. 10.1177/030913330002400204</li><li>O. Vigiak, A. Malago, F. Bouraoui, M. Vanmaercke, and J. Poesen. Adapting SWAT hillslope erosion model to predict sediment concentrations and yields in large Basins. Science of the Total Environment, 538:855-875, 2015. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.095</li><li>O. Vigiak, A. Malago, F. Bouraoui, M. Vanmaercke, F. Obreja, J. Poesen, H. Habersack, J. Feher, and S. Groselj. Modelling sediment fluxes in the Danube River Basin with SWAT. Science of the Total Environment, 2017. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.236</li></ul></article><nav class="docs-footer"><a class="docs-footer-prevpage" href="../waterbodies/">« Reservoirs and Lakes</a><a class="docs-footer-nextpage" href="../../params_vertical/">Parameters vertical concepts »</a><div class="flexbox-break"></div><p class="footer-message">Powered by <a href="https://github.com/JuliaDocs/Documenter.jl">Documenter.jl</a> and the <a href="https://julialang.org/">Julia Programming Language</a>.</p></nav></div><div class="modal" id="documenter-settings"><div class="modal-background"></div><div class="modal-card"><header class="modal-card-head"><p class="modal-card-title">Settings</p><button class="delete"></button></header><section class="modal-card-body"><p><label class="label">Theme</label><div class="select"><select id="documenter-themepicker"><option value="documenter-light">documenter-light</option><option value="documenter-dark">documenter-dark</option></select></div></p><hr/><p>This document was generated with <a href="https://github.com/JuliaDocs/Documenter.jl">Documenter.jl</a> version 0.27.25 on <span class="colophon-date" title="Monday 28 October 2024 13:55">Monday 28 October 2024</span>. Using Julia version 1.11.0.</p></section><footer class="modal-card-foot"></footer></div></div></div></body></html>
Loading

0 comments on commit 2e87c88

Please sign in to comment.