Version 0.3.0 for specimen and media

[samleeflang]

Hopefully the last changes before we move to production.
All terms should now be connected to an ontology (mostly ods: and dwc: some dcterms: or others).

ODS Prefix

ODS prefix for all terms which still weren't assigned to a ontology.

Updated arrays to be plural

We decided to update the arrays to be plural, in line with recommendated practices.
This means that where Darwin Core Classes where available we wrapped this by an ods term with the plural.
For example, dwc:Identification becomes wrapped in ods:Identifications which now contains zero or more instances of dwc:Identification.
The tradeoff is that we added an additional layer of nesting, but we believe this is worth it to keep the terms in line with the Darwin Core standard.

Other

Small changes in description for some terms.
dwc:institutionName is not a Darwin Core term, converted to ods:institutionName.

https://naturalis.atlassian.net/browse/DD-1165
https://naturalis.atlassian.net/browse/DD-1186

[sharifX]

changes look ok. we discussed via slack.

[southeo]

several comments, but quite a few are me fixing regexes that i think I wrote 😅

I think it would be helpful to have example jsons so you can validate these schemas against something. i know it's more work but a lot of them can be copied from 0.1

[southeo]

Remove/update comment, this should be a Handle or DOI

[samleeflang]

👍

[samleeflang]

Yes will add some examples. Will use a couple of specimens from test (in the current format) and then change them so they comply to this version

[TomDijkema]

Ok so instead of having the dwc:identification, etc. as an array we now have the ods variant as the array.
Guess this makes sense because now all of the dwc elements are objects

[samleeflang]

This changed a bit to ods:hasIdentification : [{}]

[southeo]

mamma mia 🍝

I think we're at the point where this could conceivably be a 1.0 release, especially if we're planning to go to production with this. What do you think?

[southeo]

This is a bit confusing. See:
"Do you want coffee or tea?"
"yes"

you think it's asking (A or B), but it's really asking is it "(A or B), or is it anything else?"

Can you split these into 2 terms, isPartOfBarcode, isPartOfNfcChip?

[TomDijkema]

Or make the field optional with a string value that can either be barcode or nfc via an enum

[sharifX]

Should 'ods:normalisedPhysicalSpecimenID' be in this list as well?

{
      "@type": "ods:Identifier",
      "ods:identifierType": "ods:normalisedPhysicalSpecimenID",
      "ods:identifierValue": "https://data.biodiversitydata.nl/naturalis/specimen/RMNH.AVES.121559"
    }

[samleeflang]

Yes we can include these but that doesn't change the data model right? It would just be one more identifier in the hasIdentifier part

[TomDijkema]

DiSSCo Threeie

[TomDijkema]

Or make the field optional with a string value that can either be barcode or nfc via an enum

[southeo]

we're almost there!!