-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Repair isDataAuthentic #474
Conversation
fix: merge to main
…-main--components--erc725.js chore(main): release 0.24.1
Sync with main to release
…-main--components--erc725.js chore(main): release 0.24.2
sync main to release
…-main--components--erc725.js chore(main): release 0.25.0
sync again with main to re-release
…-main--components--erc725.js chore(main): release 0.25.0
…-main--components--erc725.js chore(main): release 0.25.0
sync main to create next release
…-main--components--erc725.js chore: release 0.26.0
sync main to release
…-main--components--erc725.js chore(main): release 0.26.0
sync main to release
…-main--components--erc725.js chore(main): release 0.27.0
rebase: Merge develop to main
…-main--components--erc725.js chore(main): release 0.27.1
…in isDataAuthentic
592cb2e
to
06cc24c
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #474 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 83.71% 87.44% +3.72%
===========================================
Files 18 22 +4
Lines 1130 1473 +343
Branches 255 340 +85
===========================================
+ Hits 946 1288 +342
- Misses 98 174 +76
+ Partials 86 11 -75 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce (bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)?
One case where
{ verification: { method: "0x000000000" } }
was still causing a problembecause it was only check for method == null.
What is the current behaviour (you can also link to an open issue here)?
I kept on seeing method 0x00000000 verifications failing during the indexing process.
What is the new behaviour (if this is a feature change)?
It should correctly assume those verifications to be valid.
Other information: