-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TryUseNativeMKL #766
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
TryUseNativeMKL #766
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough<details>
<summary>📝 Walkthrough</summary>
## Walkthrough
The pull request updates the Dockerfile to improve both the build and runtime stages. In the build stage, it adds a command to install the MathNet.Numerics.Providers.MKL package and streamlines the installation of Node.js. The runtime stage introduces a conditional block for the `TARGETPLATFORM`, allowing for specific installations based on the platform. The overall structure of the Dockerfile is reorganized for better clarity, while environment variable declarations remain unchanged.
## Changes
| File | Change Summary |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dockerfile | - Added command to install MathNet.Numerics.Providers.MKL in the build stage. |
| | - Streamlined Node.js installation in the build stage. |
| | - Introduced conditional block for `TARGETPLATFORM` in the runtime stage to handle specific installs. |
| | - Organized overall structure for clarity. |
## Possibly related PRs
- #773: The changes in this PR also focus on improving the Dockerfile's clarity and organization, which aligns with the updates made in the main PR regarding the structure and commands in the Dockerfile.
</details> Warning Rate limit exceeded@DTTerastar has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 25 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/Program.cs (2)
26-26
: Approved: Good addition for performance improvement.The integration of native MKL support can significantly enhance numerical computation performance. This is a valuable optimization.
However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add error handling and logging for cases where MKL is not available. This will help in troubleshooting deployment issues.
- Document the expected performance impact and any new deployment requirements (e.g., MKL libraries) in the project documentation.
Consider wrapping the MKL initialization in a try-catch block and logging the result:
try { var mklEnabled = MathNet.Numerics.Control.TryUseNativeMKL(); Log.Logger.Information($"Native MKL support {(mklEnabled ? "enabled" : "not available")}"); } catch (Exception ex) { Log.Logger.Warning(ex, "Error while trying to enable native MKL support"); }This approach provides more visibility into the MKL initialization process and helps with debugging in different environments.
26-27
: Consider impact on testing and deployment pipelines.The addition of native MKL support is well-placed in the startup sequence. However, it's important to consider the following:
- Ensure that your testing environments (including CI/CD pipelines) have MKL libraries available, or that tests can run successfully without MKL.
- Update your deployment documentation to include MKL as a new dependency.
- Consider adding a configuration option to enable/disable MKL usage, which could be useful for debugging or environments where MKL is not available.
To add a configuration option, you could modify the code as follows:
var useMkl = builder.Configuration.GetValue<bool>("UseMKL", true); if (useMkl) { MathNet.Numerics.Control.TryUseNativeMKL(); } Log.Logger.Information(MathNet.Numerics.Control.Describe().Trim('\r','\n'));This allows you to control MKL usage through configuration, providing flexibility across different environments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- Dockerfile (2 hunks)
- src/Program.cs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)
21-22
: Addition of MKL Provider PackageThe command correctly adds the
MathNet.Numerics.Providers.MKL
package to the project, enabling MKL support.
32-39
: Verify the availability of Intel MKL packagesEnsure that the Intel MKL repository is accessible and the package names are correct for the target platform.
Run the following script to check available MKL packages:
992cba3
to
8c0c42b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)
21-21
: Consider pinning the MathNet.Numerics.Providers.MKL package versionFor reproducible builds, it's recommended to specify a fixed version of the package.
-RUN dotnet add src/ESPresense.Companion.csproj package MathNet.Numerics.Providers.MKL +RUN dotnet add src/ESPresense.Companion.csproj package MathNet.Numerics.Providers.MKL --version 3.0.0
34-41
: Add cleanup steps after package installationTo reduce the image size, it's recommended to clean up package manager cache and unnecessary files after installation.
RUN if [ "${TARGETPLATFORM}" = "linux/amd64" ]; then \ apt-get update && apt-get install -y apt-transport-https gnupg software-properties-common wget && \ wget https://apt.repos.intel.com/intel-gpg-keys/GPG-PUB-KEY-INTEL-SW-PRODUCTS.PUB && \ apt-key add GPG-PUB-KEY-INTEL-SW-PRODUCTS.PUB && \ rm GPG-PUB-KEY-INTEL-SW-PRODUCTS.PUB && \ echo "deb https://apt.repos.intel.com/mkl all main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/intel-mkl.list && \ - apt-get update && apt-get install -y intel-mkl-64bit-2020.0-088; \ + apt-get update && apt-get install -y intel-mkl-64bit-2020.0-088 && \ + apt-get clean && \ + rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*; \ fi
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Dockerfile
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint 21-41
: Verify graceful fallback on non-amd64 platforms
Since MKL is only installed on amd64 platforms, ensure that the application has proper fallback mechanisms for other architectures.
✅ Verification successful
MKL provider is properly handled with automatic fallback
The codebase shows proper handling of MathNet.Numerics providers:
- Program.cs logs the active provider configuration at startup:
Log.Logger.Information(MathNet.Numerics.Control.Describe())
, which helps track which provider is being used. - The code uses MathNet.Numerics for various mathematical operations (linear algebra, optimization) but doesn't explicitly force MKL usage.
- MathNet.Numerics automatically falls back to managed providers when native providers are unavailable, which is a built-in feature of the library.
The application will work correctly on non-amd64 platforms using the managed provider instead of MKL, with no additional handling required.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for MKL provider initialization and fallback handling
ast-grep --pattern 'MathNet.Numerics.Control.UseNativeMKL()'
rg -A 5 'UseNativeMKL|MKL' --type csharp
Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check for any MKL-related package references in the project file
rg -l "MathNet.Numerics.Providers.MKL" --type xml
# Check for any MathNet.Numerics usage and initialization
rg -A 5 "using MathNet.Numerics" --type csharp
# Look for any provider initialization or configuration code
ast-grep --pattern 'Control.$_()' --lang c-sharp
# Check Program.cs or Startup.cs for initialization code
fd -e cs "(Program|Startup).cs$" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 8871
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit