Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add configuration option to delay message queue resume #456

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

valentin-dimov
Copy link
Contributor

Companion to EVerest/libocpp#283

@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ config:
description: If true websocket can be disconnected and connected externally
type: boolean
default: false
MessageQueueResumeDelay:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably makes sense to have this in the OCPP (1.6) module as well

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We would need to extend the libocpp PR a bit as well, in order to allow passing that setting to the 1.6 chargepoint. Should we do that as part of this PR?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@valentin-dimov valentin-dimov force-pushed the vd-delay-message-queue-resume-after-reconnect branch from 0f284d4 to 4ba9cbb Compare December 7, 2023 12:47
Copy link
Contributor

@hikinggrass hikinggrass left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please update libocpp rev then this should build and be able to merge

Signed-off-by: Valentin Dimov <[email protected]>
@valentin-dimov valentin-dimov merged commit f270e33 into main Dec 8, 2023
2 of 3 checks passed
@valentin-dimov valentin-dimov deleted the vd-delay-message-queue-resume-after-reconnect branch December 8, 2023 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants