Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduction of baseTx #128

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 6, 2024
Merged

Introduction of baseTx #128

merged 5 commits into from
Mar 6, 2024

Conversation

dusannosovic-ethernal
Copy link

Description

All transaction types, including dynamicTx, legacyTx, etc., share the same set of fields. This PR includes changes that introduce a new type that consolidates these base fields, encompassing all transaction types.

Changes include

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change that solves an issue)
  • Hotfix (change that solves an urgent issue, and requires immediate attention)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (change that is not backwards-compatible and/or changes current functionality)

Breaking changes

Please complete this section if any breaking changes have been made, otherwise delete it

Checklist

  • I have assigned this PR to myself
  • I have added at least 1 reviewer
  • I have added the relevant labels
  • I have updated the official documentation
  • I have added sufficient documentation in code

@goran-ethernal goran-ethernal force-pushed the introduction-of-baseTx branch 2 times, most recently from 78ce793 to eb65ee1 Compare March 6, 2024 10:43
@goran-ethernal goran-ethernal force-pushed the introduction-of-baseTx branch from eb65ee1 to a099a53 Compare March 6, 2024 10:48
@goran-ethernal goran-ethernal merged commit e5d5a9b into develop Mar 6, 2024
10 checks passed
@goran-ethernal goran-ethernal deleted the introduction-of-baseTx branch March 6, 2024 11:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants