-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
selection of cellId in the LPD1M object #100
Comments
Would it be useful to have an option to get the data back with cell IDs in the index instead of pulse IDs? We can do that quite easily. You can already get the cell IDs with |
PR #101 would add an option to get data with cell IDs in the index instead of pulse IDs. Please take a look and let me know if that would be useful to you. :) |
Thank you. Getting the cell IDs in addition to the pulse IDs will be very helpful
… On 9 Nov 2020, at 16:26, Thomas Kluyver ***@***.***> wrote:
PR #101 <#101> would add an option to get data with cell IDs in the index instead of pulse IDs. Please take a look and let me know if that would be useful to you. :)
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#100 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARVQ2Z2RLY7GLKQGF37TQVDSPACZNANCNFSM4TOBMGPQ>.
|
This would be more 'instead' rather than 'in addition'. It would let you choose whether the data is labelled with pulse IDs or cell IDs, but there still wouldn't be an easy way to get both. Is that still useful? |
As long as it is a choice but we can change it back and forth that is ok. The issue is that there are certain thing she need the cell ID as the identifier and some other parameters were we will need to compare pulse IDs.
… On 9 Nov 2020, at 16:37, Thomas Kluyver ***@***.***> wrote:
This would be more 'instead' rather than 'in addition'. It would let you choose whether the data is labelled with pulse IDs or cell IDs, but there still wouldn't be an easy way to get both. Is that still useful?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#100 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARVQ2ZZWANYFK32EQQRN6BLSPAEETANCNFSM4TOBMGPQ>.
|
Thanks! |
The LPD1M object is giving us train ids and pulse ids but it would be essential that we also get the cell Ids, since all the analysis fails when using veto patterns on the LDP otherwise, since the memory cell allocation is not equivalent to the pulse ids.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: