Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Login via deeplink should open modal in request money #31529

Conversation

dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 commented Nov 20, 2023

Details

Login via deep link should open the modal in Request money

Fixed Issues

$ #29115
PROPOSAL: #29115 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open a request money report or raise one and open it
  2. Click on the description or merchant and copy the URL
  3. Logout and paste the URL
  4. Login and observe that the app opens the correct description or merchant modal
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Open a request money report or raise one and open it
  2. Click on the description or merchant and copy the URL
  3. Logout and paste the URL
  4. Login and observe that the app opens the correct description or merchant modal
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
chrome-resize.mov
iOS: Native
ios-resize.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
safari-resize.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web-resize.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop-resize.mov

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 changed the title fix: login via deeplink should open modal in request money Login via deeplink should open modal in request money Nov 20, 2023
@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 marked this pull request as ready for review November 20, 2023 12:00
@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 20, 2023 12:00
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team November 20, 2023 12:01
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 20, 2023

@abdulrahuman5196 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@abdulrahuman5196 abdulrahuman5196 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dukenv0307 Kindly check on the comments

@@ -104,18 +123,34 @@ function EditRequestPage({report, route, parentReport, policyCategories, policyT
// A flag for showing the tags page
const shouldShowTags = isPolicyExpenseChat && (transactionTag || OptionsListUtils.hasEnabledOptions(lodashValues(policyTagList)));

const reportAction = ReportActionsUtils.getReportAction(parentReportID, parentReportActionID);

// For small screen, we don't call openReport API when we go to a sub report page by deeplink
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Where are we calling openReport API separately for big screens?
  2. If the said is true for small screen devices, shouldn't other types of reports be affected by the same? Like Task and edit Task?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 Nov 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. We are calling openReport API in report screen but when we open a page by deeplink in small screen, LHN is displayed and we don't have access to report screen so openReport API isn't called.

  2. Here we need transation data which is returned in OpenReport API but in Edit Task page we only use report data which is returned in OpenApp API.

const isTransactionLoadingRoute = lodashGet(transaction, 'comment.isLoading', false);
const isTransactionLoading = lodashGet(transaction, 'isLoading', false);

const isDataLoading = isLoadingReportData || isTransactionLoading || isTransactionLoadingRoute || _.isEmpty(transaction);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For checking if reportData is loaded, is it possible to use WithReportOrNotFound? So that we re-use existing functions?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we use WithReportOrNotFound, we will show two loading pages one in HOC, and one on this page when OpenReport API is called that will make this page is flickered briefly.

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

@dukenv0307 Any update on the above?

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

Update today.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 I responded in the review thread.

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

@dukenv0307 The changes doesn't seem to work properly in my testing.

Screen.Recording.2023-12-07.at.11.09.29.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-12-07.at.11.11.22.PM.mov

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 I believe the bug mentioned here is not related to my code change.
The current behavior of the app is signing in via deeplink does not take the user to the correct report in the URL -> this causes OpenReport API not to get called, leading to infinite loading

Please check the video attached below for more details.

deeplink-resize.mov

I think we'd better put this on hold to find the PR or issue that caused this new bug

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Will take a review today

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 Friendly bump.

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

@dukenv0307 I doubt if the route is returned wrongly. I just wrapped the EditRequestPage with WithReportOrNotFound and printed the received reportID it had proper reportID. I think there could be something else happening here.

Code change I Made.

diff --git a/src/ROUTES.ts b/src/ROUTES.ts
index 49067d1c7b..f292a636b8 100644
--- a/src/ROUTES.ts
+++ b/src/ROUTES.ts
@@ -156,8 +156,8 @@ const ROUTES = {
         getRoute: (reportID: string) => `r/${reportID}` as const,
     },
     EDIT_REQUEST: {
-        route: 'r/:threadReportID/edit/:field',
-        getRoute: (threadReportID: string, field: ValueOf<typeof CONST.EDIT_REQUEST_FIELD>) => `r/${threadReportID}/edit/${field}` as const,
+        route: 'r/:reportID/edit/:field',
+        getRoute: (reportID: string, field: ValueOf<typeof CONST.EDIT_REQUEST_FIELD>) => `r/${reportID}/edit/${field}` as const,
     },
     EDIT_CURRENCY_REQUEST: {
         route: 'r/:threadReportID/edit/currency',
diff --git a/src/pages/EditRequestPage.js b/src/pages/EditRequestPage.js
index e41f30779f..855f39be4b 100644
--- a/src/pages/EditRequestPage.js
+++ b/src/pages/EditRequestPage.js
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ import EditRequestReceiptPage from './EditRequestReceiptPage';
 import EditRequestTagPage from './EditRequestTagPage';
 import reportActionPropTypes from './home/report/reportActionPropTypes';
 import reportPropTypes from './reportPropTypes';
+import withReportOrNotFound from './home/report/withReportOrNotFound';
 
 const propTypes = {
     /** Route from navigation */
@@ -285,6 +286,7 @@ EditRequestPage.displayName = 'EditRequestPage';
 EditRequestPage.propTypes = propTypes;
 EditRequestPage.defaultProps = defaultProps;
 export default compose(
+    withReportOrNotFound(),
     withOnyx({
         report: {
             key: ({route}) => `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${route.params.threadReportID}`,
diff --git a/src/pages/home/report/withReportOrNotFound.tsx b/src/pages/home/report/withReportOrNotFound.tsx
index cf2c0d5aca..5c10e6cb81 100644
--- a/src/pages/home/report/withReportOrNotFound.tsx
+++ b/src/pages/home/report/withReportOrNotFound.tsx
@@ -73,7 +73,10 @@ export default function (
 
         return withOnyx<TProps & RefAttributes<TRef>, OnyxProps>({
             report: {
-                key: ({route}) => `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${route.params.reportID}`,
+                key: ({route}) => {
+                    console.log("Abdul Test" + JSON.stringify(route))
+                    return `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${route.params.reportID || route.params.threadReportID}`
+                },
             },
             isLoadingReportData: {

Video of testing:

Screen.Recording.2024-01-03.at.9.01.51.PM.mov

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 Updated. I fixed this issue in the past here #28641 but it was removed when we migrate ReportScreenIDSetter to Typescript.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 Any update here.

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Will check tomorrow. @dukenv0307 Meanwhile could you kindly fix the merge conflicts.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 resolved conflict.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 I think we should hold this until EditRequestPage is removed.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 Updated the PR to add a new solution after refactor by adding the logic to show the loading page in WithWritableReportOrNotFound.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 Friendly bump.

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Checking now

@@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ const IOURequestStepDescriptionWithOnyx = withOnyx<IOURequestStepDescriptionProp
})(IOURequestStepDescription);

// eslint-disable-next-line rulesdir/no-negated-variables
const IOURequestStepDescriptionWithWritableReportOrNotFound = withWritableReportOrNotFound(IOURequestStepDescriptionWithOnyx);
const IOURequestStepDescriptionWithFullTransactionOrNotFound = withFullTransactionOrNotFound(IOURequestStepDescriptionWithOnyx);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dukenv0307 I am not entirely sure on what changes we are making here since this PR is very old and the new changes are different than the accepted proposal.

Could you let me know the changes and why we need to do this and how will it fix the issue?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you let me know the changes and why we need to do this and how will it fix the issue?

@abdulrahuman5196 The bug still happens after we refactor the edit flow. The RCA is we don't have the logic to display the loading page when the report is loading. My solution is we will handle this in withWritableReportOrNotFound HOC so all pages of money request flow can display a loading page when the report is loading. That's why we have to wrap that HOC on the outside.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 Any update here.

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Checking now

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Checking again

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Whenever I pick this issue I am not getting OTPs 😪 due to site issues I think.
https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1715879150080079

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

I can get OTP to login.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

Whenever I pick this issue I am not getting OTPs 😪 due to site issues I think.

@abdulrahuman5196 Is this issue resolved?

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Checking now

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Checking now again

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

abdulrahuman5196 commented May 30, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-05-30.at.11.40.51.PM.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-05-30.at.11.46.18.PM.mp4
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-05-30.at.11.15.34.PM.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-05-30.at.11.28.52.PM.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-05-30.at.11.00.08.PM.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-05-30.at.11.10.41.PM.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@abdulrahuman5196 abdulrahuman5196 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes looks good and works well. Reviewers checklist is also complete.

All yours. @robertjchen

🎀 👀 🎀
C+ Reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from robertjchen May 30, 2024 18:24
Copy link
Contributor

@robertjchen robertjchen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@robertjchen robertjchen merged commit 1ce235f into Expensify:main May 31, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 6, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.4.79-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants