[$250] Expense that has been approved and paid says “Only visible to you”

[m-natarajan]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 1.4.73-4
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @danielrvidal
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1715703163807979

Action Performed:

1. Submit a scanned receipt expense report to approver through iOS app
2. As approver approve and pay the submitted expense
3. Open the report as employee and observe the preview

Expected Result:

Only visible you should disappear since the report is approved and paid

Actual Result:

“Only visible to you” displayed as if it was still scanning.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

RPReplay_Final1715702441.mov

logs-2024-05-14_16_01_00.537-2024-05-14 16_12_54.331.txt

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

• Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01d5ffb37c2677a636
• Upwork Job ID: 1791214432620130304
• Last Price Increase: 2024-06-06

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @sakluger (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot]

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01d5ffb37c2677a636

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @slafortune (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @dukenv0307 (External)

[sakluger]

@slafortune I'll be OOO through May 31, can you please manage this issue until then? Thanks!

[melvin-bot]

@sakluger, @slafortune, @dukenv0307 Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

[melvin-bot]

@sakluger, @slafortune, @dukenv0307 Eep! 4 days overdue now. Issues have feelings too...

[melvin-bot]

📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸

[slafortune]

No proposals yet!
Requesting here first - https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1716499608xxxx72

[slafortune]

I will be on Vacation until June 4th, so adding another BZ until @sakluger is back 👍

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

[sakluger]

Changing this back to daily since it's now causing multiple issues (see #43839). Also added hot pick so we can get a BE engineer volunteer.

[melvin-bot]

@sakluger, @dukenv0307 Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

[sakluger]

No volunteers yet.

[sakluger]

No update

[trjExpensify]

I think this one should go away with removing whispers on scanning receipts. @youssef-lr's backend PR for that was reverted today, but when we have a new PR up, let's link it here and then retest thereafter.

[sakluger]

@trjExpensify is there a new PR yet for removing whispers on scanning receipts?

[trjExpensify]

Yep: https://github.com/Expensify/Auth/pull/11354

[trjExpensify]

So we good here?

[sakluger]

Yep, we're good.