Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Form Provider Refactor] RoomNameInput fixes #32432

Conversation

kowczarz
Copy link
Contributor

@kowczarz kowczarz commented Dec 4, 2023

Details

Followup to #30996

Fixed Issues

$ #32398
PROPOSAL: #32398 (comment)
$ #32399
$ #32386

Tests

Workspace new room:

  1. Log in
  2. Press + button > Press Start chat > Switch to # Room
  3. Check if errors appears when incorrect data is typed in
  4. Check if when spaces are replaced with -
  5. Type correct data and create a new room

Room name:

  1. Log in
  2. If there are no rooms, create a new one (steps above)
  3. In the chat room press its name > Press Settings > Press Room name
  4. Check if the room name is propagated
  5. Check if errors appears when incorrect data is typed in
  6. Check if when spaces are replaced with -
  7. Type correct data and update the name of the room

Edit room name without change:

  1. Go to home screen
  2. Go to + > Start chat > Room.
  3. Create a room with a valid name.
  4. Go to the room > Click header > Settings.
  5. Click Room name.
  6. Click Save without any edit.

Check for consistent errors:

  1. Go to home screen
  2. Go to + > Start chat > Room.
  3. Click Create room without entering room name.
  4. Type [[<<> (don't copy paste) in the name field.

Ensure input can be re-focused:

  1. Open the App
  2. Log in with any Expensify account
  3. Press + button > Press Start chat > Switch to # Room
  4. Enter incorrect data for receiving an error
  5. Focus on another input field
  6. Try to focus again on the name input field
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

Same as above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.native_H.265.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android.web_H.265.mp4
iOS: Native
ios.native_H.265.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios.web_H.265.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_H.265.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop_H.265.mp4

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@kowczarz kowczarz force-pushed the kowczarz/fix-room-name-edit-error branch from d1142ac to 9fa1591 Compare December 4, 2023 18:38
@kowczarz kowczarz changed the title Fix Room - Error shows up when saving existing and valid room name with any changes [Form Provider Refactor] RoomNameInput fixes Dec 4, 2023
@kowczarz kowczarz marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2023 17:08
@kowczarz kowczarz requested a review from a team as a code owner December 6, 2023 17:08
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from s77rt and removed request for a team December 6, 2023 17:08
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 6, 2023

@s77rt Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@kowczarz
Copy link
Contributor Author

kowczarz commented Dec 6, 2023

Cc. @luacmartins

@luacmartins luacmartins self-requested a review December 6, 2023 17:21
Comment on lines 46 to 21
<TextInput
<InputWrapper
InputComponent={TextInput}
inputID={inputID}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is the best to do here. Using InputWrapper inside RoomNameInput to wrap TextInput feels a littler over-engineered. I would rather prefer InputWrapper to wrap RoomNameInput. InputWrapper should wrap the highest-level input.

RoomNameInput > InputWrapper > TextInput
InputWrapper > RoomNameInput > TextInput

PS: We also have a problem with that structure on NewDatePicker

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would look better if we have moved the InputWrapper outside the component, but that would require dividing the logic of RoomNameInput between the component and screens where it's used. Since the logic of room input is quite complex and the current refactor has already caused some regressions in this PR I would only migrate the input to FormProvider. As soon as we will be sure the current changes won't introduce any regressions I would refactor the RoomNameInput according your suggestions in a separate PR.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm trying to get rid of the valueParser and displayParser that we are passing to the Form. The FromProvider should not handle those. We should instead call the onInputChange in the RoomNameInput and supply the modified value.

This approach should result in the least code changes.

but that would require dividing the logic of RoomNameInput between the component and screens

Can you please elaborate on this one?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm trying to get rid of the valueParser and displayParser that we are passing to the Form. The FromProvider should not handle those. We should instead call the onInputChange in the RoomNameInput and supply the modified value.

That would be great, but since we need to display different value than the one that is sent to Onyx, I couldn't find any better solution.

The second part I managed to move, I didn't spot that I forgot to move some props.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we need to display different value than the one that is sent to Onyx

This is already handled within <RoomNameInput />: value={value.substring(1)}.

Let's consider this scenario:

  1. Revert all the changes in this PR
  2. In places that we use RoomNameInput (i.e. RoomNamePage and WorkspaceNewRoomPage), replace <RoomNameInput ... /> with <InputWrapper InputComponent={RoomNameInput} ... />
  3. What could go wrong in this case?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s77rt Ok, I reverted some changes, I think now it should look fine.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. This is looking much better. I still see some changes to src/components/RoomNameInput/ that does not look needed. And in src/libs/RoomNameInputUtils.ts too Can you please check again?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will do it tomorrow

@kowczarz kowczarz force-pushed the kowczarz/fix-room-name-edit-error branch from 026ca81 to c56d3af Compare December 12, 2023 15:30
@kowczarz kowczarz requested a review from s77rt December 13, 2023 10:47
src/components/RoomNameInput/index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/RoomNameInput/index.native.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Dec 13, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native android
Android: mWeb Chrome mweb-chrome
iOS: Native ios
iOS: mWeb Safari mweb-safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari web
MacOS: Desktop desktop

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

luacmartins commented Dec 13, 2023

We're so close. @kowczarz could you please address the latest comments? Let's get this merged today.

…name-edit-error

# Conflicts:
#	src/components/Form/FormProvider.js
#	src/pages/workspace/WorkspaceNewRoomPage.js
@kowczarz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @luacmartins, sorry I didn't manage to fix it yesterday, since I had to leave office earlier, but now it's ready.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Dec 14, 2023

@kowczarz Lint please

@kowczarz kowczarz force-pushed the kowczarz/fix-room-name-edit-error branch from 730731c to 31f79a6 Compare December 14, 2023 13:33
@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Dec 14, 2023

The "Ensure draft works" test can be removed.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from tgolen December 14, 2023 13:42
Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for working on this!

@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit 2c822e5 into Expensify:main Dec 14, 2023
17 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.14-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.14-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.4.14-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants