Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added limit exceed error message with new limit #33601

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Feb 10, 2024

Conversation

dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor

@dhairyasenjaliya dhairyasenjaliya commented Dec 26, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #18647
PROPOSAL: #18647 (comment)

Tests

Test case send money description

  1. Login in to app
  2. Press FAB -> Select send money -> add money
  3. Select any contact
  4. Choose Description
  5. Enter more then 500 characters
  6. Notice input should not allow to exceed 500 characters limit

Test case edit description

  1. Login in to app
  2. Select any conversation that has money sent
  3. Go to description try to edit
  4. Notice input should not allow to exceed 500 characters limit

Test case Request money description

  1. Login in to app
  2. Press FAB -> Select request money -> select manual
  3. Select any contact
  4. Choose Description
  5. Enter more then 500 characters
  6. Notice input should not allow to exceed 500 characters limit

Test case workspace name

  1. Login in to app
  2. Press FAB -> new room
  3. Enter more then 100 characters on workspace name field
  4. Notice input should not allow to exceed 100 characters limit

Test case for workspace name

  1. Login in to app
  2. Press on avatar icon -> select workspace
  3. Select any. Workspace or create new -> press on workspace name to open setting page
  4. Enter more then 100 characters on workspace name field
  5. Notice input should not allow to exceed 100 characters limit

Test case for task name

  1. Login in to app
  2. Press on FAB -> assign task
  3. Enter more then 100 characters on task name field
  4. Notice input should not allow to exceed 100 characters limit

Test case for task description

  1. Login in to app
  2. Press on FAB -> assign task
  3. Enter more then 100 characters on task name field
  4. Notice input should not allow to exceed 100 characters limit

Test case for welcome message for room

1. Login in to app
2. Navigate to any room
3. Open room setting -> select Welcome message
4. Notice input should not allow to exceed 500 characters limit

Test case for legal name

  1. Login in to app
  2. Navigate to settings -> go to profile -> go to personal details page -> go to legal name page
  3. check first and last name can only add upto 100 characters
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Same as above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari workspace Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 12 14 33 AM Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 12 14 40 AM Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 12 16 18 AM sendmoney
MacOS: Desktop workspace Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 12 14 33 AM Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 12 14 40 AM Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 12 16 18 AM sendmoney

@dhairyasenjaliya dhairyasenjaliya requested a review from a team as a code owner December 26, 2023 15:33
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from mananjadhav and removed request for a team December 26, 2023 15:33
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 26, 2023

@mananjadhav Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@dhairyasenjaliya Can you please update the Test Steps/QA Steps to cover all features where we applied the fix?

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav updated steps & screenshots

src/CONST.ts Outdated
WORKSPACE_NAME_CHARACTER_LIMIT: 80,

TITLE_CHARACTER_LIMIT: 100,
SUPPORTING_CHARACTER_LIMIT: 500,
Copy link
Collaborator

@mananjadhav mananjadhav Jan 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am wondering if this should be SUPPORTING_TEXT_LIMIT or DESCRIPTION_LIMIT.

@youssef-lr wdyt?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think DESCRIPTION_LIMIT is more consistent with what we have in the backend.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav @youssef-lr do we need to handle the legal name as well?

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@mananjadhav @youssef-lr do we need to handle the legal name as well?

Yes. We closed one the linked issue stating we'll take care of it here.

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay and any other remaining @mananjadhav

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

Okay and any other remaining @mananjadhav

I am checking through the issues.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@dhairyasenjaliya did we cover legal name? I can't find new commits.

@youssef-lr @dhairyasenjaliya any comments on this one?

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhairyasenjaliya commented Jan 9, 2024

@mananjadhav legal names added and QA steps also updated

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

mananjadhav commented Jan 14, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android-length-validation.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
mweb-chrome-length-validation.mov
iOS: Native
ios-length-validation.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
mweb-safari-length-validation.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari web-length-welcome-message
web-length-legal-name.mov
web-length-money-description web-length-task web-length-workspace-name web-length-money-request-description
web-length-legal-name-with-latin-error.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop-length-validation_7cMHizon.mp4

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@dhairyasenjaliya @youssef-lr I can see one potential issue:

When more than one fields have the validation error, we only show the error to the first field. Is that the expected behavior? Because we don't have the validation in the current form we can't make out.

Screenshot 2024-01-16 at 10 59 53 PM

I have other forms where both the fields show the error.
image

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav Yeah we should stick with the current approach to show both error validations I have added that on the new commit

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

Is that the only place? Do we need to worry about any other places?

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor Author

I checked its only for one place which I just updated @mananjadhav

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@dhairyasenjaliya One more issue, the latin error message doesn't get cleared in the legal name.

legal-name-length-latin.mov

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav fixed on latest commit

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @dhairyasenjaliya the above listed bugs are resolved in the latest push.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from youssef-lr January 16, 2024 19:46
@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@dhairyasenjaliya We've got Typescript check failing. Can you merge the latest main to see if it fixes it?

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor Author

hey @youssef-lr all conflicts fixed please check

@youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor

youssef-lr commented Feb 6, 2024

I remember we had changes in ReportWelcomeMessagePage but can't see them anymore? we also changed this to be max 500, right now it's 10000

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor Author

@youssef-lr on latest main it was removed for welcome message

@youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor

@dhairyasenjaliya there are conflicts, once fixed I can approve & merge.

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor Author

@youssef-lr all done please merge once you get a chance

@youssef-lr youssef-lr merged commit d786be0 into Expensify:main Feb 10, 2024
15 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/youssef-lr in version: 1.4.40-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 failure ❌

@lanitochka17
Copy link

This PR is failing because of issue #36342

The issue is reproducible in: All environments

Bug6376647_1707748776886.bandicam_2024-02-12_22-22-11-178.mp4

@youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor

@dhairyasenjaliya can you look into this asap please?

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@youssef-lr I don't think it is related to the PR, it crashes on the production as well. I think because of the undefined in the URL.

image

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.40-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 failure ❌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants