Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[No QA] use a better approach for useResponsiveLayout hook #34743

Conversation

rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah commented Jan 18, 2024

Details

#30528 (comment)

Fixed Issues

$ #30528

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah requested a review from a team as a code owner January 18, 2024 16:38
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from getusha and removed request for a team January 18, 2024 16:38
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 18, 2024

@getusha Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor Author

@getusha @roryabraham After encountering regressions caused by #33426, I am modifying the logic for the useResponsiveLayout hook. Instead of passing a parameter to screens in the modal stack navigator and checking for it in the hook, I am now obtaining the navigator name directly from the navigationRef in the hook without altering the navigation logic. What are your thoughts on this approach?

roryabraham
roryabraham previously approved these changes Jan 18, 2024
@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

@getusha bump

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Jan 23, 2024

@rayane-djouah Just tested this on AttachmentModal and it is showing me a modal for small screens.

  1. Open any chat
  2. Press on your account's avatar
  3. Press on the avatar in "Profile" to expand it.
Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 9 22 20 PM

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Jan 23, 2024

@rayane-djouah this is the changes i made to the component, please let me know if i did something wrong.

Diff

diff --git a/src/components/AttachmentModal.js b/src/components/AttachmentModal.js
index bd8d535e54..abf4c9c858 100755
--- a/src/components/AttachmentModal.js
+++ b/src/components/AttachmentModal.js
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ import SafeAreaConsumer from './SafeAreaConsumer';
 import transactionPropTypes from './transactionPropTypes';
 import withLocalize, {withLocalizePropTypes} from './withLocalize';
 import withWindowDimensions, {windowDimensionsPropTypes} from './withWindowDimensions';
+import useResponsiveLayout from "@hooks/useResponsiveLayout";
 
 /**
  * Modal render prop component that exposes modal launching triggers that can be used
@@ -136,6 +137,8 @@ function AttachmentModal(props) {
     const [isDownloadButtonReadyToBeShown, setIsDownloadButtonReadyToBeShown] = React.useState(true);
     const {windowWidth} = useWindowDimensions();
 
+    const {shouldUseNarrowLayout} = useResponsiveLayout();
+
     const isOverlayModalVisible = (props.isReceiptAttachment && isDeleteReceiptConfirmModalVisible) || (!props.isReceiptAttachment && isAttachmentInvalid);
 
     const [file, setFile] = useState(
@@ -445,14 +448,14 @@ function AttachmentModal(props) {
                 propagateSwipe
             >
                 <GestureHandlerRootView style={styles.flex1}>
-                    {props.isSmallScreenWidth && <HeaderGap />}
+                    {shouldUseNarrowLayout && <HeaderGap />}
                     <HeaderWithBackButton
                         title={headerTitle}
                         shouldShowBorderBottom
                         shouldShowDownloadButton={shouldShowDownloadButton}
                         onDownloadButtonPress={() => downloadAttachment(source)}
-                        shouldShowCloseButton={!props.isSmallScreenWidth}
-                        shouldShowBackButton={props.isSmallScreenWidth}
+                        shouldShowCloseButton={!shouldUseNarrowLayout}
+                        shouldShowBackButton={shouldUseNarrowLayout}
                         onBackButtonPress={closeModal}
                         onCloseButtonPress={closeModal}
                         shouldShowThreeDotsButton={shouldShowThreeDotsButton}
@@ -494,7 +497,7 @@ function AttachmentModal(props) {
                                 <Animated.View style={[StyleUtils.fade(confirmButtonFadeAnimation), safeAreaPaddingBottomStyle]}>
                                     <Button
                                         success
-                                        style={[styles.buttonConfirm, props.isSmallScreenWidth ? {} : styles.attachmentButtonBigScreen]}
+                                        style={[styles.buttonConfirm, shouldUseNarrowLayout ? {} : styles.attachmentButtonBigScreen]}
                                         textStyles={[styles.buttonConfirmText]}
                                         text={translate('common.send')}
                                         onPress={submitAndClose}

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good catch! @getusha
This bug occurs because we are in the right modal within the account details, so isInModal will indeed be true. However, isSmallScreenWidth remains false. The fundamental issue with such bugs stems from our initial definition of shouldUseNarrowLayout. It was set to true if either isInModal or isSmallScreenWidth was true, but there are instances where we need to apply specific styles exclusively for mobile, or only when in the right/left hand panel.

image

Consequently, I propose that the optimal solution involves returning both isSmallScreenWidth and isInModal from the useResponsiveLayout hook, and then utilizing them as required. While we could also return isInModal for necessary use cases and continue employing isSmallScreenWidth from the useWindowDimensions hook, it seems more effective to establish useResponsiveLayout as the singular interface for determining the appropriate layout. This is addressed by dfcbaf7

here is the diff for debugging @getusha :

Diff
diff --git a/src/components/AttachmentModal.js b/src/components/AttachmentModal.js
index bd8d535e54..67fba81181 100755
--- a/src/components/AttachmentModal.js
+++ b/src/components/AttachmentModal.js
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import {withOnyx} from 'react-native-onyx';
 import _ from 'underscore';
 import useLocalize from '@hooks/useLocalize';
 import useNetwork from '@hooks/useNetwork';
+import useResponsiveLayout from '@hooks/useResponsiveLayout';
 import useStyleUtils from '@hooks/useStyleUtils';
 import useTheme from '@hooks/useTheme';
 import useThemeStyles from '@hooks/useThemeStyles';
@@ -136,6 +137,8 @@ function AttachmentModal(props) {
     const [isDownloadButtonReadyToBeShown, setIsDownloadButtonReadyToBeShown] = React.useState(true);
     const {windowWidth} = useWindowDimensions();
 
+    const {isSmallScreenWidth, isInModal} = useResponsiveLayout();
+
     const isOverlayModalVisible = (props.isReceiptAttachment && isDeleteReceiptConfirmModalVisible) || (!props.isReceiptAttachment && isAttachmentInvalid);
 
     const [file, setFile] = useState(
@@ -149,6 +152,8 @@ function AttachmentModal(props) {
     const {isOffline} = useNetwork();
 
     useEffect(() => {
+        console.log('isInModal: ', isInModal);
+        console.log('isSmallScreenWidth: ', isSmallScreenWidth);
         setFile(props.originalFileName ? {name: props.originalFileName} : undefined);
     }, [props.originalFileName]);
 
@@ -445,14 +450,14 @@ function AttachmentModal(props) {
                 propagateSwipe
             >
                 <GestureHandlerRootView style={styles.flex1}>
-                    {props.isSmallScreenWidth && <HeaderGap />}
+                    {isSmallScreenWidth && <HeaderGap />}
                     <HeaderWithBackButton
                         title={headerTitle}
                         shouldShowBorderBottom
                         shouldShowDownloadButton={shouldShowDownloadButton}
                         onDownloadButtonPress={() => downloadAttachment(source)}
-                        shouldShowCloseButton={!props.isSmallScreenWidth}
-                        shouldShowBackButton={props.isSmallScreenWidth}
+                        shouldShowCloseButton={!isSmallScreenWidth}
+                        shouldShowBackButton={isSmallScreenWidth}
                         onBackButtonPress={closeModal}
                         onCloseButtonPress={closeModal}
                         shouldShowThreeDotsButton={shouldShowThreeDotsButton}
@@ -494,7 +499,7 @@ function AttachmentModal(props) {
                                 <Animated.View style={[StyleUtils.fade(confirmButtonFadeAnimation), safeAreaPaddingBottomStyle]}>
                                     <Button
                                         success
-                                        style={[styles.buttonConfirm, props.isSmallScreenWidth ? {} : styles.attachmentButtonBigScreen]}
+                                        style={[styles.buttonConfirm, isSmallScreenWidth ? {} : styles.attachmentButtonBigScreen]}
                                         textStyles={[styles.buttonConfirmText]}
                                         text={translate('common.send')}
                                         onPress={submitAndClose}

What do you think @getusha @roryabraham ?

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Jan 24, 2024

@rayane-djouah that seems like the new solution differs from what we're trying to achieve.
Lets discuss this here, could you mention this case? https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1698364514493649

src/hooks/useResponsiveLayout.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah requested a review from getusha January 25, 2024 21:28
@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Jan 26, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 26, 2024

🎯 @getusha, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #35224.

@roryabraham roryabraham merged commit 5e7de3d into Expensify:main Jan 26, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.4.33-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 1.4.33-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah deleted the use-a-better-approach-for-useResponsiveLayout-hook branch February 6, 2024 17:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants