Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Audit][Implementation] - Remove Intl Polyfills which are supported by Hermes by separating iOS and android implementation #38565

Conversation

hurali97
Copy link
Contributor

@hurali97 hurali97 commented Mar 19, 2024

Details

This PR fixes the linked regression issues which were caused by the PR.

Fixed Issues

$ #38447
$ #38504
$ #38502
PROPOSAL: #35234 (comment)

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Test steps for first issue:

  • Launch App
  • Navigate to WS Chat
  • Tap on [+] sign and select request money
  • Verify the app does not crash

Test steps for second issue ( I couldn't verify the second issue as I don't have any Collect workspace, if reviewer could help in testing this case, that'd be great ):

Precondition:

  • User is an admin of Collect workspace.

  • Open app

  • Go to Profile > Workspaces > Collect workspace.

  • Go to Taxes.

  • Click Add rate.

  • Click Value.

  • Verify you can add tax value

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome

N/A

iOS: Native
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari

N/A

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

N/A

MacOS: Desktop

N/A

@hurali97 hurali97 changed the title perf: remove not needed Intl polyfills by separating iOS and android [Audit][Implementation] - Remove Intl Polyfills which are supported by Hermes by separating iOS and android implementation Mar 19, 2024
@hurali97 hurali97 marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2024 11:08
@hurali97 hurali97 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 19, 2024 11:08
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from s77rt and removed request for a team March 19, 2024 11:08
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 19, 2024

@s77rt Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Mar 19, 2024

Please add #35234 to the Fixed issues

Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt s77rt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was there a discussion on why we are removing each polyfill? They were all added because Hermes either didn't support them at all or had limited support

src/libs/IntlPolyfill/index.ios.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/IntlPolyfill/index.ios.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@hurali97
Copy link
Contributor Author

Was there a discussion on why we are removing each polyfill? They were all added because Hermes either didn't support them at all or had limited support

This was discovered as part of the audit phase, see here. Once discovered, we discussed it here and then proceeded with the implementation.

We were aware that some of the Polyfill APIs are not supported by Hermes and that's why we didn't remove them. Regarding the NumberFormat crashing on iOS because of missing Polyfill, we couldn't test it on iOS as I was having some SDK issues, which I mentioned in the PR. Anyways, now we are re-creating this PR aiming to isolate iOS and android polyfills.

As you've mentioned for DateTimeFormat polyfill is still not available in iOS, I will double-check it and then add back the polyfill for iOS only 👍

src/libs/IntlPolyfill/index.ios.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
require('@formatjs/intl-locale/polyfill');

// Required to polyfill NumberFormat on iOS
// see: https://github.com/facebook/hermes/issues/1172#issuecomment-1776156538
require('@formatjs/intl-pluralrules/polyfill');
polyfillNumberFormat();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is an additional check inside that function: hasOldCurrencyData. Seems like even if the API is supported it may not work as expected e.g. old API. Seeing that we have an early return in enabling that polyfill it may be safer to keep it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s77rt I have some reservations around hasOldCurrencyData, if you could explain a bit more about it. So the thing is the output of this function differs only by a space character, otherwise both of the strings are the same on all platforms.

I printed both values of the comparison in the console and it appears that the output by NumberFormat contains a special space character which is different from normal space character.

Screenshot 2024-03-21 at 1 33 02 PM

If I update this const value, only then we do early return otherwise we are always polyfilling NumberFormat. Android and Web also works fine BUT iOS doesn't. Which means that the below code is not working as expected. Ideally, iOS should not fall in the early-return. We probably want to update this condition to include Intl.NumberFormat(locale, options).formatToParts(number) because this is what's missing in iOS and it causes the crash.

/**
 * Check if the locale data is as expected on the device.
 * Ensures that the currency data is consistent across devices.
 */
function hasOldCurrencyData(): boolean {
    return (
        new Intl.NumberFormat(CONST.LOCALES.DEFAULT, {
            style: CONST.POLYFILL_TEST.STYLE,
            currency: CONST.POLYFILL_TEST.CURRENCY,
            currencyDisplay: CONST.POLYFILL_TEST.FORMAT,
        }).format(Number(CONST.POLYFILL_TEST.SAMPLE_INPUT)) !== CONST.POLYFILL_TEST.EXPECTED_OUTPUT
    );
}

export default function () {
    if (Intl && 'NumberFormat' in Intl && !hasOldCurrencyData()) {
        return;
    }

    require('@formatjs/intl-numberformat/polyfill-force');

    // Load en & es Locale data
    require('@formatjs/intl-numberformat/locale-data/en');
    require('@formatjs/intl-numberformat/locale-data/es');
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

iOS do not fall into the early-return, perhaps you tested after the polyfill was applied already.
Screenshot 2024-03-22 at 12 10 22 AM

Got same results on Android

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s77rt Did you test with the applied diff? I also get the same results as you but without the diff which is what we have in main.

With the diff, each platform falls into the early return and only iOS fails because polyfill isn't applied and we get error on Intl.NumberFormat(locale, options).formatToParts(number). So I am wondering whether we should include formatToParts in the condition for early return?

Otherwise, let's keep the things as is 👍

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hurali97 Let's do the following:

  1. Fix the POLYFILL_TEST.EXPECTED_OUTPUT value (use correct whitespace) so the polyfill is applied only when needed
  2. Add formatToParts to the condition

Summary:

  • Intl.NumberFormat polyfill is not needed on Android.
  • Intl.NumberFormat polyfill is needed on iOS due to missing formatToParts funcition
  • Intl.NumberFormat polyfill is needed on Web due to outdated currency data on some browsers (issue)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s77rt Perfect. I have addressed these changes, you can re-review 👍

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Mar 25, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native android
Android: mWeb Chrome mweb-chrome
iOS: Native ios
iOS: mWeb Safari mweb-safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari web
MacOS: Desktop desktop

src/libs/IntlPolyfill/polyfillNumberFormat.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/IntlPolyfill/index.ios.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Mar 26, 2024

Thank you!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from luacmartins March 26, 2024 11:26
@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit 886be54 into Expensify:main Mar 26, 2024
18 checks passed
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 26, 2024

@luacmartins looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Mar 26, 2024
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Tests were passing

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants