-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Report Fields Beta #44695
Merged
+3
−17
Merged
Remove Report Fields Beta #44695
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d0a59fd
Remove REPORT_FIELDS beta
neonbhai a14654a
Merge branch 'Expensify:main' into remove-beta-report-fields
neonbhai aa56076
Merge branch 'Expensify:main' into remove-beta-report-fields
neonbhai fa20e0f
Merge branch 'Expensify:main' into remove-beta-report-fields
neonbhai 35045fc
Remove unused const
neonbhai File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These checks need to be updated from isPaidGroupPolicyExpenseReport to isControlPolicyExpenseReport
Report fields are going to be a control only feature (unless it's the title field)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@thienlnam hi, this logic seems to actually check for the title field and return the report name according to formula. So we probably do want this as it is right now?
Same for this line which is creating an optimistic report and getting the title field.
The check on this line and is for showing the Report Fields in the
MoneyReportView
. Changing this toisControlPolicyExpenseReport
means we would hide the title field, since the render logic is coupled with report fields. I could fix it if you suggest (We would change thegetAvailableReportFields
to two functions, one which returns the title, other handling remaining fields)If we change the check, it might flag as a regression since Report Fields are still configurable on OldDot for Collect Policies:
Video
Screen.Recording.2024-07-12.at.9.01.23.AM.mov
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yeah that's a fair point about how they are coupled right now. In that case, we probably don't need to do anything right now - we'll handle that later when we remove it from collect polcies