-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: resolve dupe button on one-expense report #50133
Merged
+92
−45
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1993ffd
fix: resolve dupe button on one-expense report
daledah 140b0fe
fix: ui on narrow layout
daledah d644b39
fix: styles
daledah 30122b7
fix: update ui
daledah c230fa5
fix: lint
daledah 1e08c6b
Merge branch 'main' into fix/49793
daledah b4ff475
fix: ui
daledah 5119fd6
fix: remove gap on large screens
daledah d5a7b0f
fix: ui
daledah 83c838b
fix: ui
daledah 907ab0a
fix: lint
daledah cb4be38
refactor: change logics to more precise
daledah 51ba3f8
Merge branch 'main' into fix/49793
daledah 729c6df
fix: remove redundant condition
daledah File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Things to be considered
shouldDuplicateButtonBeSuccess
:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sobitneupane I think submit button not being
success
-themed is expected:App/src/components/MoneyReportHeader.tsx
Line 244 in 392d56a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe so. In that case, should we have Review duplicates button
success
? cc: @dannymcclainThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔 Hmm, maybe? In this case I'm not sure. I don't think it's wrong to have two regular buttons here. But maybe @JmillsExpensify will have a better informed opinion on if the review duplicates button should be
success
colored in this situation.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not wrong to have two regular buttons. This is the case of delayed submission being enabled, with a submission frequency set.