Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initialise pusher before rendering children #54188
Initialise pusher before rendering children #54188
Changes from 3 commits
cb179e5
fe5c385
e50ab7e
ceebb96
ee98fe0
5393b37
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this strategy of preserving the original promise work fine if the user does this:
Account A
Account B
?
I imagine that before a new promise would be created, now we reuse the same. Could that cause a bug?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! It could lead to this sequence and crash:
User A
logs ininitPromise
is resolvedUser A
logs outsocket
is reassigned tonull
User B
logs ininitPromise
is resolved butsocket
is not created yetApp/src/libs/Pusher/pusher.ts
Lines 249 to 250 in 31adaa8
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But we can avoid this by creating new
Promise
indisconnect
function like that:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! That would cause a bug as now if you call
pusher.subscribe()
it will fail with[Pusher] instance not found
, socket is cleared on logout and not created again since the promise is already resolved.Actually the bug already exists on main too as we can always call
subscribe
beforeinit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Github comments are not loading up in time 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@s77rt yeah, github lags sometimes but it seems that we all agree to the solution :D