Boulder field reclaim reduction. #415
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The reclaim of the boulder field generator tends to be excessive. A 17km map with just two spawns could easily hold 200k reclaim. I toned it down, mainly by getting rid of the regular reclaim around cliffs and reducing the occurence of single boulders a lot. This way I could preserve most of the boulder fields while still drastically reducing the amount of reclaim. From my testing we are now at around 10k reclaim per player.
Additionally the reclaim and resource densities are now in the map description as well, which makes it easier to understand what is happening.