-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validation fixes #350
Validation fixes #350
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@RonHildebrandt: Can you check if the warning is gone with this fix?
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9566547897Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9566881828Details
💛 - Coveralls |
5744b26
to
9a32059
Compare
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9567027186Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9582994016Details
💛 - Coveralls |
@RonHildebrandt Everything should be fixed now. If you like you can give it another test. But I checked with your ellipsometry example files. |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9611686574Details
💛 - Coveralls |
1 similar comment
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9611686574Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some of the function does not have any doc. Having a doc (even without the explanation of the function parameters) would be very helpful for future modification and development. Other than that I do not see any other big issue with this PR.
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9714482524Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9714518298Details
💛 - Coveralls |
1 similar comment
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9714518298Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Fixes
ENTRY
forNXentry
). Previously, it ignored if the found group has an actual name. This lead to wrong groups being returned.my_data(NXdata)
is containsDATA(NXdata)
if the latter is part of a super-concept of the current appdefnumpy<2.0.0