Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add some try exception function. #57

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

fengzz-coding
Copy link
Contributor

@fengzz-coding fengzz-coding commented Oct 8, 2024

add some try exception function.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling for validation assignments, improving response validation and management of various failure scenarios.
    • Implemented structured retry logic for failed requests, ensuring continuity in the assignment request process.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined code by consolidating error handling into a single try-except block, improving clarity and maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made to the src/validate.py file focus on enhancing error handling and control flow within the loop function. The implementation now utilizes a structured try-except block to manage exceptions during validation assignment requests. This new structure consolidates error logging and retry mechanisms into a single flow, improving clarity and maintainability while preserving functionality for handling various failure scenarios, such as rate limits and task availability.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/validate.py Enhanced error handling in loop function with try-except block, improved response validation, removed redundant checks and logging statements.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API
    participant Logger

    Client->>API: Request validation assignment
    alt Response is JSON
        API-->>Client: Return validation assignment
    else Response is not JSON
        API-->>Logger: Log error "Response not JSON"
        Client->>Client: Sleep and retry
    end
    alt Rate limit error
        API-->>Logger: Log error "Rate limit exceeded"
        Client->>Client: Sleep and retry
    end
    alt No available tasks
        API-->>Logger: Log error "No tasks available"
        Client->>Client: Sleep and retry
    end
Loading

🐇 "In the code where errors might creep,
A try-except now takes a leap.
With logs to guide and sleep to wait,
Our requests are handled, oh so great!
No more redundancies, just a neat flow,
Hopping through errors, watch us go!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8366410 and 67e68ba.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/validate.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used

src/validate.py Show resolved Hide resolved
src/validate.py Outdated
Comment on lines 426 to 466
try:
resp = fed_ledger.request_validation_assignment(task_id_num)
if resp.status_code == 200:
last_successful_request_time[index] = time.time()
break
else:
logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {resp.content}")
if resp.json() == {
"detail": "Rate limit reached for validation assignment lookup: 1 per 3 minutes"
}:
time_since_last_success = (
time.time() - last_successful_request_time[index]
)
if time_since_last_success < ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL:
time_to_sleep = (
ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL - time_since_last_success
if not resp.headers.get("content-type", "").startswith(
"application/json"
):
logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {resp.content}")
time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
continue
if resp.json() == {
"detail": "No task submissions available to validate"
}:
logger.info(
"Failed to ask assignment_id: No task submissions available to validate"
)
logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(time_to_sleep)} seconds")
time.sleep(time_to_sleep)
continue
else:
logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(TIME_SLEEP)} seconds")
time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
continue
else:
logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {resp.content}")
if resp.json() == {
"detail": "Rate limit reached for validation assignment lookup: 1 per 3 minutes"
}:
time_since_last_success = (
time.time() - last_successful_request_time[index]
)
if time_since_last_success < ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL:
time_to_sleep = (
ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL - time_since_last_success
)
logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(time_to_sleep)} seconds")
time.sleep(time_to_sleep)
continue
else:
logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(TIME_SLEEP)} seconds")
time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
continue
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {e}")
time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
continue
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Refactor the response handling logic to reduce duplication and improve readability

The current implementation has multiple nested if statements and repeated calls to resp.json(), which can be inefficient and make the code harder to read. Caching the result of resp.json() and restructuring the conditional logic can enhance performance and maintainability.

Consider refactoring the code as follows:

 try:
     resp = fed_ledger.request_validation_assignment(task_id_num)
     if resp.status_code == 200:
         last_successful_request_time[index] = time.time()
         break
     else:
         if not resp.headers.get("content-type", "").startswith("application/json"):
             logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {resp.content}")
             time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
             continue
-        if resp.json() == {
+        resp_json = resp.json()
+        if resp_json == {
             "detail": "No task submissions available to validate"
         }:
             logger.info(
                 "Failed to ask assignment_id: No task submissions available to validate"
             )
-        else:
-            logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {resp.content}")
-        if resp.json() == {
+        elif resp_json == {
             "detail": "Rate limit reached for validation assignment lookup: 1 per 3 minutes"
         }:
             time_since_last_success = (
                 time.time() - last_successful_request_time[index]
             )
             if time_since_last_success < ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL:
                 time_to_sleep = (
                     ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL - time_since_last_success
                 )
                 logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(time_to_sleep)} seconds")
                 time.sleep(time_to_sleep)
             continue
+        else:
+            logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {resp.content}")
+            logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(TIME_SLEEP)} seconds")
+            time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
+            continue
 except Exception as e:
     logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {e}")
     time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
     continue

This refactoring:

  • Caches resp.json() in the resp_json variable to avoid multiple JSON parsing.
  • Replaces the second if with an elif to streamline the logic.
  • Moves the continue statements inside the respective conditional blocks to reduce redundancy.
  • Enhances readability by reducing nested structures.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
try:
resp = fed_ledger.request_validation_assignment(task_id_num)
if resp.status_code == 200:
last_successful_request_time[index] = time.time()
break
else:
logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {resp.content}")
if resp.json() == {
"detail": "Rate limit reached for validation assignment lookup: 1 per 3 minutes"
}:
time_since_last_success = (
time.time() - last_successful_request_time[index]
)
if time_since_last_success < ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL:
time_to_sleep = (
ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL - time_since_last_success
if not resp.headers.get("content-type", "").startswith(
"application/json"
):
logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {resp.content}")
time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
continue
if resp.json() == {
"detail": "No task submissions available to validate"
}:
logger.info(
"Failed to ask assignment_id: No task submissions available to validate"
)
logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(time_to_sleep)} seconds")
time.sleep(time_to_sleep)
continue
else:
logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(TIME_SLEEP)} seconds")
time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
continue
else:
logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {resp.content}")
if resp.json() == {
"detail": "Rate limit reached for validation assignment lookup: 1 per 3 minutes"
}:
time_since_last_success = (
time.time() - last_successful_request_time[index]
)
if time_since_last_success < ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL:
time_to_sleep = (
ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL - time_since_last_success
)
logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(time_to_sleep)} seconds")
time.sleep(time_to_sleep)
continue
else:
logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(TIME_SLEEP)} seconds")
time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
continue
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {e}")
time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
continue
try:
resp = fed_ledger.request_validation_assignment(task_id_num)
if resp.status_code == 200:
last_successful_request_time[index] = time.time()
break
else:
if not resp.headers.get("content-type", "").startswith(
"application/json"
):
logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {resp.content}")
time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
continue
resp_json = resp.json()
if resp_json == {
"detail": "No task submissions available to validate"
}:
logger.info(
"Failed to ask assignment_id: No task submissions available to validate"
)
elif resp_json == {
"detail": "Rate limit reached for validation assignment lookup: 1 per 3 minutes"
}:
time_since_last_success = (
time.time() - last_successful_request_time[index]
)
if time_since_last_success < ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL:
time_to_sleep = (
ASSIGNMENT_LOOKUP_INTERVAL - time_since_last_success
)
logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(time_to_sleep)} seconds")
time.sleep(time_to_sleep)
continue
else:
logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {resp.content}")
logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(TIME_SLEEP)} seconds")
time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
continue
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"Failed to ask assignment_id: {e}")
time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
continue

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/validate.py (1)

426-460: Improved error handling, but consider refining exception handling

The new try-except block has improved the overall error handling and control flow. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The use of a general except Exception as e is still present. As mentioned in a previous review, it's better to catch specific exceptions when possible.

  2. There's some code duplication in logging and sleep operations.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Catch specific exceptions before the general Exception:
try:
    resp = fed_ledger.request_validation_assignment(task_id_num)
    # ... (rest of the try block)
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
    logger.error(f"Network error while requesting assignment_id: {e}")
    time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
    continue
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
    logger.error(f"Error decoding JSON response: {e}")
    time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
    continue
except Exception as e:
    logger.error(f"Unexpected error while requesting assignment_id: {e}")
    time.sleep(TIME_SLEEP)
    continue
  1. Refactor the sleep operations to reduce duplication:
def sleep_and_continue(sleep_time):
    logger.info(f"Sleeping for {int(sleep_time)} seconds")
    time.sleep(sleep_time)
    return

# Then replace the sleep operations with:
sleep_and_continue(TIME_SLEEP)
# or
sleep_and_continue(time_to_sleep)

These changes will make the code more maintainable and easier to debug in the future.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67e68ba and 98b6900.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/validate.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/validate.py (1)

426-460: Overall improvement in error handling and control flow

The changes made to the loop function have significantly enhanced the error handling and control flow for requesting validation assignments. The new structure consolidates various response scenarios and error handling into a single try-except block, improving code readability and maintainability.

While there are still some minor improvements that could be made (as suggested in the previous comment), this refactoring is a step in the right direction. It aligns well with the PR objective of adding "some try exception function" and addresses the core issues effectively.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant