Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for file-lock mode of configuration node (backport #14498) #14501

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 28, 2023

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented Sep 28, 2023

This is an automatic backport of pull request #14498 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

"terminal" and "file-lock" description are mixed up.

Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit b8ebb7f)
When the configuration node is entered in file-lock mode, candidate
and running datastores are locked. Any configuration change is followed
by an implicit commit which leads to a crash of mgmtd, because double
lock is prohibited by an assert. When working in file-lock mode, we
shouldn't do implicit commits which is disabled by allowing pending
configuration changes.

Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit d3aa9ad)
When the config node is entered in file-lock mode, we should actually
remember it to correctly apply the workaround in `vtysh_exit`.
Otherwise, the file-lock mode is dropped once we exit any node one level
below the config node.

Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 1a09cf3)
@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

NetDEF-CI commented Sep 28, 2023

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-14374/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9: Failed (click for details)

Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-TOPO9U18AMD64-14374/test

Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-14374/artifact/TOPO9U18AMD64/TopotestLogs/log_topotests.txt
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9: Unknown Log
URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-14374/artifact/TOPO9U18AMD64/TopotestDetails/

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7: Failed (click for details) Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-14374/artifact/TOPO7U18ARM8/TopotestDetails/ Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7: No useful log found
Successful on other platforms/tests
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
  • CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1
  • Static analyzer (clang)
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 0
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 2
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
  • Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 4
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 6
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
  • Debian 9 deb pkg check
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 5
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 7
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
  • Debian 10 deb pkg check
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
  • Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
  • Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 0
  • Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
  • Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-14374/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@ton31337 ton31337 merged commit 59aa33b into stable/9.0 Sep 28, 2023
8 checks passed
@ton31337 ton31337 deleted the mergify/bp/stable/9.0/pr-14498 branch September 28, 2023 12:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants