Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ospf6d: fix setting of the forwarding address in AS-External LSAs #14590

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2023

Conversation

rwestphal
Copy link
Member

When redistributing a local route, ensure the forwarding address field of AS-External LSAs is only set when the associated nexthop interface is OSPF-enabled. This is necessary because the OSPF RFC requires that the AS-External LSA forwarding address should be resolvable using an intra-area or inter-area path.

Fixes #14462.

When redistributing a local route, ensure the forwarding address field
of AS-External LSAs is only set when the associated nexthop interface
is OSPF-enabled. This is necessary because the OSPF RFC requires that
the AS-External LSA forwarding address should be resolvable using an
intra-area or inter-area path.

Fixes FRRouting#14462.

Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <[email protected]>
@donaldsharp
Copy link
Member

once this passes ci I will get in

@donaldsharp
Copy link
Member

@Mergifyio backport dev/9.1 stable/9.0 stable/8.5

@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Oct 13, 2023

backport dev/9.1 stable/9.0 stable/8.5

✅ Backports have been created

@donaldsharp donaldsharp merged commit 914c45c into FRRouting:master Oct 13, 2023
donaldsharp added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2023
ospf6d: fix setting of the forwarding address in AS-External LSAs (backport #14590)
donaldsharp added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2023
ospf6d: fix setting of the forwarding address in AS-External LSAs (backport #14590)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Routed v6 prefix not announced via OSPF
2 participants