-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
staticd: fix nexthop tracking memory leak and add a topotest for VRFs #15285
Merged
donaldsharp
merged 5 commits into
FRRouting:master
from
idryzhov:staticd-nexthop-refcounter
Feb 8, 2024
Merged
staticd: fix nexthop tracking memory leak and add a topotest for VRFs #15285
donaldsharp
merged 5 commits into
FRRouting:master
from
idryzhov:staticd-nexthop-refcounter
Feb 8, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
donaldsharp
reviewed
Feb 3, 2024
idryzhov
force-pushed
the
staticd-nexthop-refcounter
branch
2 times, most recently
from
February 3, 2024 19:43
26c7f12
to
3a5cc0a
Compare
When processing an NHT update, we should go though all `static_vrf` structures instead of regualar `vrf`, because some of `static_vrf` may not have corresponding `vrf` and will miss the update. Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <[email protected]>
Will be used in the following commit. Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <[email protected]>
When a static route with a gateway nexthop is created, the nexthop is sent to zebra for NHT, and added to a local hash. When the nexthop's VRF is deleted from kernel, nexthop still stays in the hash. This is a memory leak, because it is never deleted from there. Even if the VRF is recreated in kernel, it is assigned with a new `vrf_id` so the old hash entry is not reused, and a new one is created. To fix the issue, remove all nexthops from the hash when the corresponding VRF is deleted, do not add nexthops to the hash if their corresponding VRF doesn't exist in kernel and don't add the same nexthop to the hash multiple times. Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <[email protected]>
idryzhov
force-pushed
the
staticd-nexthop-refcounter
branch
from
February 4, 2024 20:28
3a5cc0a
to
ffbf4e0
Compare
ton31337
requested changes
Feb 5, 2024
Test how staticd handles VRF creation/deletion. Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <[email protected]>
idryzhov
force-pushed
the
staticd-nexthop-refcounter
branch
from
February 6, 2024 12:15
ffbf4e0
to
763ce7b
Compare
ton31337
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.