Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.4] nhrp: backport fixes #16141 and #16166 #16174

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 6, 2024

Conversation

Jafaral
Copy link
Member

@Jafaral Jafaral commented Jun 5, 2024

No description provided.

dleroy and others added 2 commits June 5, 2024 16:31
This fixes a merge conflict encountered when backporting PR 15879

Signed-off-by: Dave LeRoy <[email protected]>
- Addressed memory leak by removing `&c->peer_notifier` from the notifier list on termination. Retaining it caused the notifier list to stay active, preventing the deletion of `c->cur.peer`
  thereby causing a memory leak.

- Reordered termination steps to call `vrf_terminate` before `nhrp_vc_terminate`, preventing a heap-use-after-free issue when `nhrp_vc_notify_del` is invoked in `nhrp_peer_check_delete`.

- Added an if statement to avoid passing NULL as hash to `hash_release`, which leads to a SIGSEGV.

The ASan leak log for reference:

```
***********************************************************************************
Address Sanitizer Error detected in nhrp_topo.test_nhrp_topo/r1.asan.nhrpd.20265

=================================================================
==20265==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 112 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f80270c9b40 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdeb40)
    FRRouting#1 0x7f8026ac1eb8 in qmalloc lib/memory.c:100
    FRRouting#2 0x560fd648f0a6 in nhrp_peer_create nhrpd/nhrp_peer.c:175
    FRRouting#3 0x7f8026a88d3f in hash_get lib/hash.c:147
    FRRouting#4 0x560fd6490a5d in nhrp_peer_get nhrpd/nhrp_peer.c:228
    FRRouting#5 0x560fd648a51a in nhrp_nhs_resolve_cb nhrpd/nhrp_nhs.c:297
    FRRouting#6 0x7f80266b000f in resolver_cb_literal lib/resolver.c:234
    FRRouting#7 0x7f8026b62e0e in event_call lib/event.c:1969
    FRRouting#8 0x7f8026aa5437 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1213
    FRRouting#9 0x560fd6488b4f in main nhrpd/nhrp_main.c:166
    FRRouting#10 0x7f8025eb2c86 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21c86)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 112 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).
***********************************************************************************

***********************************************************************************
Address Sanitizer Error detected in nhrp_topo.test_nhrp_topo/r2.asan.nhrpd.20400

=================================================================
==20400==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 112 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fb6e3ca5b40 in __interceptor_malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdeb40)
    FRRouting#1 0x7fb6e369deb8 in qmalloc lib/memory.c:100
    FRRouting#2 0x562652de40a6 in nhrp_peer_create nhrpd/nhrp_peer.c:175
    FRRouting#3 0x7fb6e3664d3f in hash_get lib/hash.c:147
    FRRouting#4 0x562652de5a5d in nhrp_peer_get nhrpd/nhrp_peer.c:228
    FRRouting#5 0x562652de1e8e in nhrp_packet_recvraw nhrpd/nhrp_packet.c:325
    FRRouting#6 0x7fb6e373ee0e in event_call lib/event.c:1969
    FRRouting#7 0x7fb6e3681437 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1213
    FRRouting#8 0x562652dddb4f in main nhrpd/nhrp_main.c:166
    FRRouting#9 0x7fb6e2a8ec86 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21c86)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 112 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).
***********************************************************************************
```

Signed-off-by: Keelan Cannoo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <[email protected]>
@donaldsharp donaldsharp merged commit 2a670d0 into FRRouting:stable/8.4 Jun 6, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants