[MIRROR] Remove several functions from collections.js which have ES5 equivalents

[Steals-The-PRs]

Mirrored on Nova: NovaSector/NovaSector#2054
Original PR: tgstation/tgstation#82417

About The Pull Request

This PR should not affect players: it purely serves to clean up some old functions mentioned in https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=724810.

In summary: Refactor of collections.ts and refactor of collection manipulation. The following paragraphs go into the nuances of the PR and reading it is optional.

I originally wanted to remove flow from fp.js, but I've decided against it until I have a more permanent solution for sortBy and uniq/uniqBy

common/collections.ts Refactor

• sort(array) is the same.
• sortStrings(array) has been replaced by sort(array).
• Added types to reduce(...).
• Restored old implementation of map(...) prior to #60961.
• Rewrote most functions from the form f(...args)(array) to f(array, ...args).

ECMAScript 5 Array.prototype.* functions

Most of the functions have direct equivalents in ES5, but behavior varies slightly. Modern JS engines such as V8 and SpiderMonkey(I've not checked for IE) uses optimized objects for array functions such that typeof [].map(() => {}) is an object which is array-like, in contrast, the collection functions return an array.

All replacement functions are part of ES5(caniuse), which is supported natively by Internet Explorer version 10 and version 11(MSHTML version 6 and version 7 respectively).

collections.ts	ES5
filter((element, index, array) => {})(array)	array.filter((element, index, array) => {})
map(function)(array)	array.map(function)
map((value, key, object) => {})(object)	* Object.entries(object).map(([key. value], entries) => {})
filterMap(array, (element) => {})	array.map((element) => {}).filter((element) => element !== undefined)
reduce((accumulator, currentValue, currentIndex, array) => {}, initialValue)(array)	array.reduce((accumulator, currentValue, currentIndex, array) => {}, initialValue)
zipWith((element1, element2, element3) => {})(array1, array2, array3)	zip(array1, array2, array3).map(([element1, element2, element3]) => {})
sort(array)	** array.sort()
sortStrings(array)	** array.sort()

*: the second argument of the arrow function is Object.entries(object) rather than object.
**: there may be some differences in the way these functions sort(such as culture and casing considerations), but they should remain largely the same

Polyfills

Contrary to the statement on the original forum post, I've not decided to include Lodash because the project also encourages questionable practices. Lodash has a newer competitor, Radash, but I've decided against including that too as it's not mature enough to provide significant benefit over the functions defined in /tg/ui.

unique is a function present in core-js(a polyfill for https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-unique), but I've decided against using it because it lacks TypeScript definitions, and the proposal has been in Stage 1 for quite a while.

Vectors

Rewrote vecAdd, vecSubtract, vecMultiply, and vecDivide. The following compares the current and new implementation of vecAdd.

Current Implementation:
Reduce followed by element-wise zip(zip and addition step combined, otherwise the diagram wouldn't fit)

$$ \begin{array}{c c c c} V_1 & V_2 & V_3 & V_4 \\ \begin{bmatrix} 1\\ 2\\ 3\end{bmatrix} & \begin{bmatrix} 4\\ 5\\ 6\end{bmatrix} & \begin{bmatrix} 7\\ 8\\ 9\end{bmatrix} & \begin{bmatrix} 10\\ 11\\ 12\end{bmatrix} \end{array} \to \begin{array}{c c c} V_{1 + 2} & V_3 & V_4 \\ \begin{bmatrix} 5\\ 7\\ 9\end{bmatrix} & \begin{bmatrix} 7\\ 8\\ 9\end{bmatrix} & \begin{bmatrix} 10\\ 11\\ 12\end{bmatrix} \end{array} \to \begin{array}{c c} V_{1 + 2 + 3} & V_4 \\ \begin{bmatrix} 12\\ 15\\ 18\end{bmatrix} & \begin{bmatrix} 10\\ 11\\ 12\end{bmatrix} \end{array} \to \begin{array}{c} V_R \\ \begin{bmatrix} 22\\ 26\\ 30\end{bmatrix} \end{array} $$

New Implementation:
Zip followed by element-wise reduce

$$ \begin{array}{c c c c} V_1 & V_2 & V_3 & V_4 \\ \begin{bmatrix} 1\\ 2\\ 3\end{bmatrix} & \begin{bmatrix} 4\\ 5\\ 6\end{bmatrix} & \begin{bmatrix} 7\\ 8\\ 9\end{bmatrix} & \begin{bmatrix} 10\\ 11\\ 12\end{bmatrix} \end{array} \to \begin{array}{c c c} Z_1 & Z_2 & Z_3\\ \begin{bmatrix} 1\\ 4\\ 7\\ 10\end{bmatrix} & \begin{bmatrix} 2\\ 5\\ 8\\ 11\end{bmatrix} & \begin{bmatrix} 3\\ 6\\ 9\\ 12\end{bmatrix} \end{array} \to \begin{array}{c} V_R \\ \begin{bmatrix} 1 + 4 + 7 + 10\\ 2 + 5 + 8 + 11\\ 3 + 6 + 9 + 12\\ \end{bmatrix} \end{array} \to \begin{array}{c} V_R \\ \begin{bmatrix} 22\\ 26\\ 30\\ \end{bmatrix} \end{array} $$

---

Fixed vecNormalize. Previously, it would attempt to divide a vector by a scalar(which is not a valid argument for vecDivide). The function has been corrected to properly each vector's component by the scalar.

Other Changes

• Adjusted some types NtosNetDownloader.tsx for brevity.
• Adjusted types around LibraryAdmin.tsx to fix type errors.
• Removed fp.js' compose function.
• Rewrote StackCrafting.tsx's filterRecipeList.

Why It's Good For The Game

Reduced code debt is good.