-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[15.0][MIG] rma_purchase_operating_unit #448
Conversation
969593f
to
e2db00f
Compare
@JasminSForgeFlow can you fix this PR? It seems there are conflicts with another module, could you rebase and fix conflicts? |
e2db00f
to
b103a0f
Compare
Fixed, Thanks |
Github is telling me that there are conflicts in this PR. Can you check you rebase with the latest code? |
b103a0f
to
651b0cf
Compare
I am not sure why there is a conflict even updating it. I have just follow migration process and pushed it so it is up to date now |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 15.0 #448 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 80.68% 80.66% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 144 147 +3
Lines 4830 4840 +10
Branches 754 754
==========================================
+ Hits 3897 3904 +7
- Misses 720 723 +3
Partials 213 213
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It works same as in previous versions.
I miss some features like filling in the OU in the RMA line when selecting a source PO, but that can be done in another PR.
No description provided.