-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refac: Use offset from SDK for executable loaders #6693
Open
Abeeujah
wants to merge
2
commits into
FuelLabs:master
Choose a base branch
from
Abeeujah:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, but I believe we need a test for this. Especially because we are not sure what is going to happen if the binary does not have a data section. In earlier implementation it was obvious that the function to calculate offset returns None in that case but now I am not sure what is going to happen.
So if you are up for it, let's add a test which get's its oracle values (like the calculated shifted values with the previous implementation) and in a next commit let's apply this change and see if the calculated values are same.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @kayagokalp I did look at the SDK before I implemented this change, the function implementation is guaranteed to always return an offset, and cases where it wouldn't the program crashes here's a snippet from
Executable<Loader>
impl blockBut if you'd want a test after looking at this, what should I be testing for? that the value isn't zero? within a specific range? I'd like to hear your POV
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey again, it is possible that a binary does not contain any data section, that happens if the sway code does not have any constants and no configurable section. So if SDK is expecting this to be checked before calling the function, we might need to check this explicitly.
For testing we can use a example test script or predicate's binary from
/test/data
. And (possibly) extract the shift calculation to a separate function so that we can write tests against it.Basically call this new calculate shift function and check if the calculated shift is being calculated correctly for two types of sway scripts:
I can help with testing if you need it feel free to ping me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I'd need some help with testing it, How do I ping you? I tried on twitter, 2 days ago and you haven't responded
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will be adding the tests to this PR directly to better streamline the process, possibly tomorrow. Other than the tests this looks good to me, after the test I'll approve and hunt for your second approval :) Thanks again for the contribution.