Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve foundry setup #67

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

Improve foundry setup #67

merged 9 commits into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

janjakubnanista
Copy link
Contributor

@janjakubnanista janjakubnanista commented Feb 29, 2024

In this PR

  • Remove dependencies from package.json
    • The forge-std dependency is quite outdated, preferred way of installing this is forge install foundry-rs/forge-std
    • These dependencies are not required in production yet they would end up being installed in users' node_modules (as opposed to devDependencies)
  • Add foundry.toml and remove remappings.txt
  • Add a basic github workflow to test code once pushed (see the latest run here - I believe I'd need to get approved for this action to run for this PR)

@niran let me know if there are any changes you'd like to me to make, more than happy to oblige!

@GNSPS
Copy link
Owner

GNSPS commented Feb 6, 2025

Apologies for the delay and thank you for the contributions! 🙏

@GNSPS GNSPS changed the base branch from master to develop February 6, 2025 00:46
@GNSPS GNSPS merged commit 08e13c8 into GNSPS:develop Feb 6, 2025
GNSPS added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2025
* Add funding JSON file for RetroPGF

* Improve foundry setup (#67)

* chore: Remove dependencies

* chore: Add foundry.toml

* forge install: forge-std

v1.7.6

* chore: Remove remappings

* chore: Add .nvmrc

* chore: Add test workflow

* chore: Setup foundry in github workflow

* fix: Include recursive submodules in github workflow

* Deleting GitHub workflow from the PR because of safety concerns. Accepting all other changes.

---------

Co-authored-by: Gonçalo Sá <[email protected]>

* Remove non-aligned equality function to address concerns in #69

---------

Co-authored-by: Ján Jakub Naništa <[email protected]>
@janjakubnanista
Copy link
Contributor Author

You're most welcome @GNSPS !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants