Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which scripts should stay and which ones should go to PlatesTectonicTools repository? #3

Open
michaelchin opened this issue Nov 6, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@michaelchin
Copy link
Contributor

Let's use this thread to discuss which scripts should stay here and which should move.

@jcannon-gplates
Copy link
Contributor

Some general thoughts on the reorganization:

GPlates/tectonopy
• Will replace Earthbyte/PlateTectonicTools.
• Is mainly a library of functionality.
• Will also merge in Mike Tetley’s repo (of same name).
GPlates/pygplates-examples
• Is mainly a collection of Jupyter notebooks that are example workflows.
GPlates/pygplates-tutorials
• Can use GPlates/tectonopy to avoid code duplication.

@siwill22
Copy link
Contributor

siwill22 commented Nov 6, 2019

Two suggestions:

  1. The three notebooks related to calculating subduction flux are better described as example workflows (and use cases of ptt) rather than tutorials. So they could be moved to 'examples', or be given their own folder relevant to that study.
  2. The three notebooks used at a previous workshop are also not really pygplates tutorials, since it is hard to learn something about pygplates from these notebooks, all that code is hidden outside the notebook. They would logically lie in the 'Teaching Toolkit' repo?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants