Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: race conditions + support for multiple apps/previews #49

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2024

Conversation

venkatamutyala
Copy link
Contributor

@venkatamutyala venkatamutyala commented Sep 5, 2024

User description

fix: race conditions
fix: support for multiple apps
remove: preview QR code sectiona nd consolidate it with the deployment preview links


PR Type

Bug fix, Enhancement


Description

  • Fixed race conditions by removing unnecessary sleep and improving app status checks.
  • Enhanced support for multiple applications by consolidating preview QR code generation with deployment preview links.
  • Introduced a new function get_all_urls to handle multiple external URLs and generate QR codes.
  • Improved logging and error handling for updating PR comments.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
main.py
Fix race conditions and enhance app processing logic         

main.py

  • Removed unnecessary sleep to prevent race conditions.
  • Enhanced logic to check app status before processing URLs.
  • Consolidated preview QR code generation with deployment preview links.
  • Introduced get_all_urls function for handling multiple URLs.
  • +64/-50 

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    fix: support for multiple apps
    remove: preview QR code sectiona nd consolidate it with the deployment preview links
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Improved Error Handling
    The error handling in the update_pr function could be improved. Currently, it's catching all exceptions without specifying the type, which might mask unexpected errors.

    Code Duplication
    There's some code duplication in the nested if statements for checking app status and health. This could potentially be refactored into a separate function for better readability and maintainability.

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Error handling
    Improve exception handling by catching specific exceptions and providing more detailed error logging

    The exception handling block is too broad and may catch unexpected exceptions.
    Consider catching specific exceptions and providing more detailed error logging.

    main.py [129-145]

     try:
         r = update_pr(
             git_provider,
             git_commit_metadata,
             pr_comment,
             git_provider_api_token
         )
     
         r.raise_for_status()
     
         commits_processed.append(
             app['metadata']['annotations']['head_sha']
         )
         logger.debug(f'updated pr comment: {r.json()}')
         logger.info(f'SUCCESS. Just processed PR comment for: {app["metadata"]["name"]}')
    -except:
    -    logger.exception(f'Failed to process pr comment: {r.json()}')
    +except requests.RequestException as e:
    +    logger.exception(f'Failed to process pr comment: {str(e)}')
    +except Exception as e:
    +    logger.exception(f'Unexpected error while processing pr comment: {str(e)}')
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion enhances error handling by catching specific exceptions, which improves the robustness of the code and provides more informative logging, making it a significant improvement.

    8
    Enhancement
    Simplify the function by using a list comprehension and string joining

    The get_all_urls function could be simplified by using a list comprehension and
    joining the results, which would make the code more concise and Pythonic.

    main.py [203-212]

     def get_all_urls(external_urls):
         qr_code_url = f'https://qr-code-generator.{get_captain_domain()}/v1/qr?url='
    -    deployment_previews = ''
    -    for url in external_urls:
    -        deployment_previews += f'<details><summary>{url}</summary><br><img src="{qr_code_url}{url}" width="100" height="100"></details>'
    +    deployment_previews = ''.join(
    +        f'<details><summary>{url}</summary><br><img src="{qr_code_url}{url}" width="100" height="100"></details>'
    +        for url in external_urls
    +    )
         
    -    if deployment_previews == '':
    -        deployment_previews = "Not available. No Ingress was configured."
    -    
    -    return deployment_previews
    +    return deployment_previews or "Not available. No Ingress was configured."
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion makes the code more concise and Pythonic, improving readability and maintainability, though it is not a critical change.

    7
    Best practice
    Use a more descriptive variable name for the response object

    Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of r for the response object
    from the update_pr function. This will improve code readability and maintainability.

    main.py [130-143]

    -r = update_pr(
    +response = update_pr(
         git_provider,
         git_commit_metadata,
         pr_comment,
         git_provider_api_token
     )
     
    -r.raise_for_status()
    +response.raise_for_status()
     
     commits_processed.append(
         app['metadata']['annotations']['head_sha']
     )
    -logger.debug(f'updated pr comment: {r.json()}')
    +logger.debug(f'updated pr comment: {response.json()}')
     logger.info(f'SUCCESS. Just processed PR comment for: {app["metadata"]["name"]}')
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion improves code readability by using a more descriptive variable name, which is a good practice, but it is not crucial for functionality.

    6

    @venkatamutyala venkatamutyala merged commit c4fdfd1 into main Sep 6, 2024
    4 checks passed
    @venkatamutyala venkatamutyala deleted the fix/race-conditions-and-remove-hacks branch September 6, 2024 00:15
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants