Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add ec2 BR #1058

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024
Merged

docs: add ec2 BR #1058

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
b72d9d8
docs: add ec2 BR
killme2008 Jul 12, 2024
5e1f174
Apply suggestions from code review
nicecui Jul 16, 2024
fdd34f4
Apply suggestions from code review
nicecui Jul 16, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions docs/nightly/en/user-guide/operations/disaster-recovery/overview.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ If the Standalone is running on the local disk for WAL and data, then:
* RPO: depends on backup frequency.
* RTO: doesn't make sense in standalone mode, mostly depends on the size of the data to be restored, your failure response time, and the operational infrastructure.

Amazon EC2 with EBS volumes provides a comprehensive [Backup and Recovery solution](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prescriptive-guidance/latest/backup-recovery/backup-recovery-ec2-ebs.html) for such scenarios, and the other IaaS vendors also offer similar solutions. Choosing this one is a good start.
killme2008 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
nicecui marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

But if running the Standalone with remote WAL and object storage, there is a better DR solution:
![DR-Standalone](/DR-Standalone.png)

Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions docs/nightly/zh/user-guide/operations/disaster-recovery/overview.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ GreptimeDB 将数据存储在对象存储（如 [AWS S3](https://docs.aws.amazon
* RPO：取决于备份频率。
* RTO：在 Standalone 没有意义，主要取决于要恢复的数据大小、故障响应时间和操作基础设施。

亚马逊EC2（结合 EBS卷）提供了一个全面的[备份和恢复解决方案](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prescriptive-guidance/latest/backup-recovery/backup-recovery-ec2-ebs.html)来应对这种情况，当然其他IaaS供应商也提供类似的解决方案。选择这个方案是一个很好的开始。
nicecui marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

但是如果使用远程 WAL 和对象存储运行 Standalone，有一个更好的 DR 解决方案：

![DR-Standalone](/DR-Standalone.png)
Expand Down