-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 329
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: initialize partition range from ScanInput #4635
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]>
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4635 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.89% 84.59% -0.31%
==========================================
Files 1101 1105 +4
Lines 197288 199051 +1763
==========================================
+ Hits 167496 168384 +888
- Misses 29792 30667 +875 |
Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Co-authored-by: jeremyhi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]>
* feat: initialize partition range from ScanInput Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]> * use num_rows instead Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]> * add todo Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]> * setup unordered scan Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]> * Update src/mito2/src/read/scan_region.rs Co-authored-by: jeremyhi <[email protected]> * leave unordered scan unchanged Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Ruihang Xia <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: jeremyhi <[email protected]>
I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.
Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)
What's changed and what's your intention?
Initialize
PartitionRange
s fromScanInput
for planner. It only contains a rough time range and number of rows at present.The next step is to modify the corresponding logic about initializing
StreamContext
.This patch also fixes the problem that
RegionScanExec
always generates only 1 partition.Checklist