Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: add liveness probe #174

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

zyy17
Copy link
Collaborator

@zyy17 zyy17 commented Oct 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the Helm chart version to 0.2.20.
    • Introduced livenessProbe configurations across multiple pod templates for improved health monitoring.
    • Updated readinessProbe configurations to enhance pod readiness checks.
  • Documentation

    • Revised the README to reflect the new version and added details regarding the livenessProbe and readinessProbe configurations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the greptimedb-cluster Helm chart by incrementing the version from 0.2.19 to 0.2.20 in the Chart.yaml file. It also adds livenessProbe configurations to various pod templates within the README.md, cluster.yaml, and values.yaml files. Additionally, the readinessProbe configurations are updated to include a failureThreshold in the values.yaml. These changes enhance the health monitoring capabilities of the deployed components.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
charts/greptimedb-cluster/Chart.yaml Version updated from 0.2.19 to 0.2.20.
charts/greptimedb-cluster/README.md Version updated to 0.2.20. Added livenessProbe to base, datanode, flownode, frontend, and meta pod templates. Updated readinessProbe configurations.
charts/greptimedb-cluster/templates/cluster.yaml Added livenessProbe configuration to base, frontend, meta, datanode, and flownode main templates.
charts/greptimedb-cluster/values.yaml Added sections for livenessProbe. Updated readinessProbe with failureThreshold set to 3.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • daviderli614

Poem

In the meadow where we hop and play,
A new version blooms, hip-hip-hooray!
With liveness checks to keep us spry,
Our pods will thrive, oh me, oh my!
So let’s celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For health and happiness are finally here! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@zyy17 zyy17 requested a review from daviderli614 October 18, 2024 11:11
@zyy17 zyy17 merged commit ead535f into GreptimeTeam:main Oct 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@zyy17 zyy17 deleted the fix/add-liveness-probe branch October 18, 2024 11:15
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
charts/greptimedb-cluster/values.yaml (5)

55-67: Consider configuring readiness and liveness probes for the base component

The addition of failureThreshold to the readinessProbe and the new livenessProbe configuration are good improvements for health monitoring. However, they are currently commented out or empty. Consider uncommenting and configuring these probes with appropriate values for your use case.

For example:

readinessProbe:
  initialDelaySeconds: 10
  periodSeconds: 10
  timeoutSeconds: 5
  failureThreshold: 3
  successThreshold: 1

livenessProbe:
  initialDelaySeconds: 15
  periodSeconds: 20
  timeoutSeconds: 5
  failureThreshold: 3
  successThreshold: 1

Adjust these values based on your application's specific requirements and behavior.


135-147: Configure readiness and liveness probes for the frontend component

The addition of failureThreshold to the readinessProbe and the new livenessProbe configuration for the frontend component are good improvements. However, they are currently commented out or empty. Consider uncommenting and configuring these probes with appropriate values specific to the frontend component's behavior.

Example configuration:

readinessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health
    port: http
  initialDelaySeconds: 10
  periodSeconds: 10
  timeoutSeconds: 5
  failureThreshold: 3
  successThreshold: 1

livenessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health
    port: http
  initialDelaySeconds: 15
  periodSeconds: 20
  timeoutSeconds: 5
  failureThreshold: 3
  successThreshold: 1

Adjust these values based on the frontend component's specific requirements and endpoints.


235-259: Configure readiness and liveness probes for the meta component

The addition of failureThreshold to the readinessProbe and the new livenessProbe configuration for the meta component are good improvements for health monitoring. However, they are currently commented out or empty. Consider uncommenting and configuring these probes with appropriate values specific to the meta component's behavior.

Example configuration:

readinessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /metrics
    port: http
  initialDelaySeconds: 30
  periodSeconds: 10
  timeoutSeconds: 5
  failureThreshold: 3
  successThreshold: 1

livenessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /metrics
    port: http
  initialDelaySeconds: 45
  periodSeconds: 20
  timeoutSeconds: 5
  failureThreshold: 3
  successThreshold: 1

Adjust these values based on the meta component's specific requirements and endpoints. The meta component might need longer initial delay times due to its critical role in cluster management.


359-371: Configure readiness and liveness probes for the datanode component

The addition of failureThreshold to the readinessProbe and the new livenessProbe configuration for the datanode component are good improvements for health monitoring. However, they are currently commented out or empty. Consider uncommenting and configuring these probes with appropriate values specific to the datanode component's behavior.

Example configuration:

readinessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /metrics
    port: http
  initialDelaySeconds: 60
  periodSeconds: 15
  timeoutSeconds: 10
  failureThreshold: 5
  successThreshold: 1

livenessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /metrics
    port: http
  initialDelaySeconds: 90
  periodSeconds: 30
  timeoutSeconds: 10
  failureThreshold: 5
  successThreshold: 1

Adjust these values based on the datanode component's specific requirements. Note that datanodes might need longer initial delays and more lenient failure thresholds due to potential I/O operations during startup and regular operations. Also, consider adding custom health check endpoints that verify the datanode's ability to read and write data.


499-511: Configure probes for the experimental flownode component

The addition of failureThreshold to the readinessProbe and the new livenessProbe configuration for the flownode component are consistent with other components. However, they are currently commented out or empty. Given that the flownode is marked as "NOT READY YET", consider the following:

  1. If the flownode component is truly not ready for use, it might be premature to configure these probes. In this case, you may want to add a comment explaining that these will be configured once the component is ready for production use.

  2. If the flownode is in an experimental or testing phase, you might want to configure basic probes to assist in development and testing. For example:

readinessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health
    port: http
  initialDelaySeconds: 20
  periodSeconds: 10
  timeoutSeconds: 5
  failureThreshold: 3
  successThreshold: 1

livenessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health
    port: http
  initialDelaySeconds: 30
  periodSeconds: 20
  timeoutSeconds: 5
  failureThreshold: 3
  successThreshold: 1

Ensure to adjust these values based on the flownode component's specific requirements and current development status. Also, consider adding a comment indicating that these configurations are subject to change as the component matures.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 47cde88 and abbd8e4.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • charts/greptimedb-cluster/Chart.yaml (1 hunks)
  • charts/greptimedb-cluster/README.md (5 hunks)
  • charts/greptimedb-cluster/templates/cluster.yaml (5 hunks)
  • charts/greptimedb-cluster/values.yaml (5 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • charts/greptimedb-cluster/Chart.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (11)
charts/greptimedb-cluster/values.yaml (1)

Line range hint 1-511: Overall improvements in health monitoring configurations

The changes in this file consistently add liveness probes and update readiness probes across all components of the GreptimeDB cluster (base, frontend, meta, datanode, and flownode). This is a positive step towards improving the health monitoring and resilience of the cluster. Here are some overall recommendations:

  1. Uncomment and Configure: For each component, uncomment the probe configurations and set appropriate values. Each component may require different settings based on its specific role and behavior.

  2. Consistency: Maintain consistency in probe configurations across components where possible, but allow for component-specific adjustments as needed.

  3. Documentation: Consider adding comments explaining the chosen values for each probe configuration, especially if they differ significantly between components.

  4. Testing: Once configured, thoroughly test these probe settings in a non-production environment to ensure they don't cause unnecessary restarts or false positives.

  5. Flownode Consideration: Pay special attention to the flownode component. Its experimental status may require a different approach to probe configuration or implementation.

  6. Gradual Rollout: Consider implementing these changes gradually, starting with non-critical components in a test environment before moving to production.

These changes significantly enhance the Helm chart's capabilities for deploying a more robust and self-healing GreptimeDB cluster. Ensure all stakeholders are aware of these new configurations and their potential impact on cluster behavior.

charts/greptimedb-cluster/templates/cluster.yaml (6)

25-27: LGTM: livenessProbe added to base component

The addition of the livenessProbe configuration for the base component is well-implemented. It's conditionally added based on the values provided, which allows for flexibility in deployment configurations. This enhancement will improve the overall health monitoring of the GreptimeDB cluster.


106-108: LGTM: livenessProbe added to frontend component

The livenessProbe configuration for the frontend component has been added consistently with the base component. This maintains a uniform approach to health monitoring across different parts of the GreptimeDB cluster, which is a good practice for maintainability and operational consistency.


217-219: LGTM: livenessProbe added to meta component

The livenessProbe configuration for the meta component has been added in line with the previous components. This consistent approach to implementing health checks across different components of the GreptimeDB cluster is commendable, as it simplifies management and ensures uniform behavior.


274-276: LGTM: livenessProbe added to datanode component

The livenessProbe configuration for the datanode component has been implemented consistently with the other components. This uniform approach to health monitoring across all parts of the GreptimeDB cluster, including the critical datanode component, will significantly enhance the overall reliability and observability of the system.


357-359: LGTM: livenessProbe added to optional flownode component

The livenessProbe configuration for the flownode component has been implemented consistently with the other components. This maintains the uniform approach to health monitoring across the GreptimeDB cluster. Additionally, the entire flownode section is conditionally included, which provides flexibility in deploying this component based on specific cluster requirements.


25-27: Summary: Comprehensive addition of livenessProbe across all components

The changes made to this file consistently add livenessProbe configurations to all components of the GreptimeDB cluster (base, frontend, meta, datanode, and flownode). This enhancement significantly improves the health monitoring capabilities of the cluster, allowing for early detection of issues and potentially reducing downtime.

Key points:

  1. Consistent implementation across all components
  2. Conditional inclusion based on provided values, allowing for flexible configurations
  3. Proper integration with existing readinessProbe configurations
  4. Optional inclusion of the flownode component, providing deployment flexibility

These changes will contribute to a more robust and reliable GreptimeDB cluster deployment. Great job on implementing these improvements!

Also applies to: 106-108, 217-219, 274-276, 357-359

charts/greptimedb-cluster/README.md (4)

5-5: Version update looks good

The version has been correctly updated from 0.2.19 to 0.2.20, which is consistent with the PR objectives.


89-89: Consistent addition of livenessProbe configurations

The livenessProbe configurations have been consistently added to all relevant sections (base, datanode, flownode, frontend, and meta). This enhancement improves the health monitoring capabilities of the deployed components.

Also applies to: 109-109, 143-143, 167-167, 210-210


90-90: Consistent updates to readinessProbe configurations

The readinessProbe configurations have been consistently updated across all relevant sections (base, datanode, flownode, frontend, and meta). These updates complement the addition of livenessProbe configurations, enhancing the overall health monitoring capabilities of the components.

Also applies to: 110-110, 144-144, 168-168, 211-211


5-5: Overall changes improve health monitoring capabilities

The changes in this file consistently enhance the health monitoring capabilities of the GreptimeDB cluster Helm chart:

  1. The version has been updated from 0.2.19 to 0.2.20.
  2. livenessProbe configurations have been added to all relevant sections.
  3. readinessProbe configurations have been updated in all relevant sections.

These improvements will help in better monitoring and maintaining the health of the deployed GreptimeDB components.

Also applies to: 89-90, 109-110, 143-144, 167-168, 210-211

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants