refactor(greptimedb-standalone): rename secret and configmap #190
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/secret.yaml (1)
6-6: Document breaking change in release notes.Since this rename could affect existing deployments that reference the old secret name, please ensure this breaking change is documented in the release notes for version 0.1.31.
Consider adding a note like:
### ⚠️ Breaking Changes - Renamed secret from `<release-name>-secret` to `<release-name>-greptimedb-standalone-secret`. Existing deployments may need to be updated if they reference the old secret name directly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
charts/greptimedb-standalone/Chart.yaml(1 hunks)charts/greptimedb-standalone/README.md(1 hunks)charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/configmap.yaml(1 hunks)charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/secret.yaml(1 hunks)charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/serviceaccount.yaml(1 hunks)charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/statefulset.yaml(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- charts/greptimedb-standalone/Chart.yaml
- charts/greptimedb-standalone/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/serviceaccount.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/serviceaccount.yaml (1)
Line range hint 1-14: LGTM! The ServiceAccount template follows Helm best practices.
The template is well-structured with:
- Proper conditional creation using
.Values.serviceAccount.create - Consistent use of template functions for name generation
- Correct whitespace control with
{{-directives - Appropriate handling of labels and annotations
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/configmap.yaml (1)
5-5: LGTM! The naming change aligns with PR objectives.
The switch to using {{ include "greptimedb-standalone.fullname" . }} provides a more consistent naming scheme for the ConfigMap.
Let's verify the template function implementation to ensure it meets the requirements:
✅ Verification successful
Template function implementation is correct and no direct .Release.Name usage found
The verification confirms:
- The template function
greptimedb-standalone.fullnameis properly implemented to handle the release name consistently - No remaining direct uses of
.Release.Namefor config/secret naming were found - All resources (configmap, secret, service, etc.) consistently use the template function
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the template function implementation and its usage
# Test 1: Find the template function definition
echo "Looking for the template function definition:"
rg -A 10 'greptimedb-standalone\.fullname'
# Test 2: Find all uses of this template function to ensure consistent naming
echo "Looking for all uses of the template function:"
rg 'include "greptimedb-standalone\.fullname"'
# Test 3: Check for any remaining direct uses of .Release.Name
echo "Checking for any remaining direct uses of .Release.Name for resource naming:"
rg '{{ *\.Release\.Name *}}-(?:config|secret)'
Length of output: 13032
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler regex pattern to find any remaining direct uses of .Release.Name
echo "Checking for any remaining direct uses of .Release.Name:"
rg '\.Release\.Name.*-config|\.Release\.Name.*-secret'
# Let's also verify the template function implementation
echo "Checking the template function implementation:"
cat charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/_helpers.tpl | grep -A 10 'define "greptimedb-standalone.fullname"'
Length of output: 799
charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/secret.yaml (1)
6-6: LGTM! Verify upgrade strategy for secret rename.
The change to use greptimedb-standalone.fullname template function aligns with Helm best practices and provides more specific resource naming.
Let's verify if there are any other templates referencing the old secret name:
✅ Verification successful
Secret rename is safe for upgrades
The secret rename is safe because:
- The StatefulSet references the secret using the same templating function:
{{ include "greptimedb-standalone.fullname" . }}-secret - There's also a fallback for custom secret name via
objectStorage.credentials.existingSecretName - The change maintains consistency across all resources using the same naming pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential references to the old secret name pattern
rg -l "\.Release\.Name.*-secret" charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any references to the secret in deployment or other templates
rg -l "secret" charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/
# Also check for specific references to this secret in templates
rg "secretName.*secret" charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/
Length of output: 227
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the statefulset.yaml to see how it references the secret
cat charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/statefulset.yaml
Length of output: 5823
charts/greptimedb-standalone/templates/statefulset.yaml (3)
Line range hint 1-171: Overall StatefulSet structure looks good!
The template follows Kubernetes and Helm best practices with:
- Consistent use of template functions
- Proper conditional logic
- Good organization of resources and configurations
103-103:
Breaking change: Secret name modification requires migration steps.
The change from .Release.Name to the full template function improves naming consistency but will break existing deployments that rely on the default secret name.
Let's verify the impact:
Consider adding migration notes to the changelog or documentation to guide users in:
- Backing up existing secrets
- Recreating secrets with the new naming convention
- Updating any external references
131-131:
Breaking change: ConfigMap name modification requires migration steps.
The change from .Release.Name to the full template function improves naming consistency but will break existing deployments that rely on the default ConfigMap name.
Let's verify the impact:
Consider adding migration notes to the changelog or documentation to guide users in:
- Backing up existing ConfigMaps
- Recreating ConfigMaps with the new naming convention
- Updating any external references
When
.Release.Namename is internal, the names of configmap and secret areinternal-configandinternal-secret. After modification, the names isinternal-greptimedb-standalone-configandinternal-greptimedb-standalone-secret.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
greptimedb-standaloneHelm chart to version0.1.31.Bug Fixes