chore: upgrade operator version from v0.1.3 to v0.1.4-alpha.2 #211
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request includes updates to the Helm charts for Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
charts/greptimedb-operator/templates/crds/crd-greptimedbstandalone.yaml (1)
Several list fields in the CRD schema lack atomic annotations
The following list fields should be considered for adding
x-kubernetes-list-type: atomicannotations to prevent partial updates:
- Container-related lists:
command,args,env,envFrom,ports,volumeMountssecurityContext.capabilities.add/drop- Pod-level lists:
containers,initContainersvolumesand its subfieldstolerationsimagePullSecrets- Probe-related lists in
livenessProbe,readinessProbe,startupProbeNote: These fields are commonly used in Kubernetes manifests and would benefit from atomic update semantics to prevent race conditions and ensure consistency, especially for critical container and pod configurations.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
791-1037: LGTM! Schema enhancement improves data consistency.The addition of
x-kubernetes-list-type: atomicannotations to pod affinity and selector fields is a good practice. This ensures atomic updates to these lists, preventing potential race conditions and maintaining scheduling predicate validity.Let's verify if all relevant list fields have the atomic annotation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining list fields that might benefit from atomic annotation # Look for list fields in the CRD that might need atomic annotation rg -A 2 "type: array" charts/greptimedb-operator/templates/crds/crd-greptimedbstandalone.yaml | grep -v "x-kubernetes-list"Length of output: 15372
charts/greptimedb-operator/templates/crds/crd-greptimedbcluster.yaml (1)
Consider adding atomic list type annotations to command and environment arrays
The verification reveals several array fields in the CRD that could benefit from the
x-kubernetes-list-type: atomicannotation, particularly:
- Container command arrays
- Environment variable arrays
- Environment from arrays
These arrays should be treated atomically to prevent partial updates that could lead to inconsistent container configurations.
commandfield at line ~830envfield at line ~850envFromfield at line ~870Note: These fields are commonly used in container specifications and should follow the same atomic update pattern as the affinity rules to maintain consistency and prevent partial updates that could lead to container misconfiguration.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
803-1049: LGTM! Good addition of atomic list type annotations.The addition of
x-kubernetes-list-type: atomicannotations to array fields in affinity rules and volume claim templates is a good practice. This ensures atomic list operations and prevents partial updates that could lead to inconsistencies in Kubernetes.Let's verify if we should add similar annotations to other array fields in the CRD:
Also applies to: 3875-4121, 6921-7167, 16117-16363, 17917-17923
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find array fields that might benefit from atomic list type annotations # Look for array type definitions without atomic annotation rg 'type: array(?![\s\S]*x-kubernetes-list-type)' charts/greptimedb-operator/templates/crds/crd-greptimedbcluster.yamlLength of output: 379
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find array fields that might benefit from atomic list type annotations # Look for array type definitions without atomic annotation rg --pcre2 'type: array(?![\s\S]*?x-kubernetes-list-type)' charts/greptimedb-operator/templates/crds/crd-greptimedbcluster.yamlLength of output: 36437
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's get more context around these array fields to understand their purpose # We'll look for array type definitions with surrounding context rg --pcre2 -B2 -A1 'type: array(?![\s\S]*?x-kubernetes-list-type)' charts/greptimedb-operator/templates/crds/crd-greptimedbcluster.yaml | head -n 20Length of output: 845
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
charts/greptimedb-cluster/Chart.yaml(1 hunks)charts/greptimedb-cluster/README.md(2 hunks)charts/greptimedb-cluster/values.yaml(1 hunks)charts/greptimedb-operator/Chart.yaml(1 hunks)charts/greptimedb-operator/README.md(2 hunks)charts/greptimedb-operator/templates/crds/crd-greptimedbcluster.yaml(54 hunks)charts/greptimedb-operator/templates/crds/crd-greptimedbstandalone.yaml(9 hunks)charts/greptimedb-operator/values.yaml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- charts/greptimedb-operator/Chart.yaml
- charts/greptimedb-cluster/README.md
- charts/greptimedb-cluster/Chart.yaml
- charts/greptimedb-operator/README.md
🔇 Additional comments (3)
charts/greptimedb-operator/values.yaml (1)
11-11:
Version mismatch and alpha release notice
The PR title mentions upgrading to v0.1.4-alpha.1, but the code shows v0.1.4-alpha.2. Additionally, this is an alpha release which may contain breaking changes or unstable features.
charts/greptimedb-cluster/values.yaml (1)
17-17: LGTM: Version update is consistent
The initializer image tag update to v0.1.4-alpha.2 is consistent with the operator version update.
charts/greptimedb-operator/templates/crds/crd-greptimedbstandalone.yaml (1)
2591-2597: LGTM! Consistent selector handling.
The addition of atomic annotations to ephemeral volume selector matchExpressions maintains consistency with other selector fields in the CRD.
daviderli614
changed the title
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
greptimedb-clusterandgreptimedb-operatorto enhance functionality and compatibility.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores